These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 12401048

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of early activator treatment in patients with class II malocclusion evaluated by thin-plate spline analysis.
    Lux CJ, Rübel J, Starke J, Conradt C, Stellzig PA, Komposch PG.
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 11302588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA, El-Bialy AA.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010 Apr; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R, Amiri SS.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effectiveness of twin blocks and extraoral maxillary splint (Thurow) appliances for the correction of Class II relationships.
    Fernandes ÁF, Brunharo IH, Quintão CC, Costa MG, de Oliveira-Costa MR.
    World J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 11(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 20877731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI, Dinçer M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P, Baccetti T, Mucedero M, Pavoni C, Franchi L.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Space planning sensitivity and specificity: Royal London Space Planning and Korkhaus Analyses.
    Dause R, Cobourne M, McDonald F.
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20575199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Relationship between bilateral condylar bone change and mandibular morphology: a study using morphometry.
    Alkhamrah B, Yamada K, Yamaki M, Ali IM, Hanada K.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002 May; 17(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 12353938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP, da Rosa Martins JC, Martins LP, Buschang PH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.