These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


120 related items for PubMed ID: 12401048

  • 21. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS, Cohen G, Ghafari J.
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
    Cozza P, De Toffol L, Iacopini L.
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S, Aksu M, Germeç D.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study.
    Lund DI, Sandler PJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 9457025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The effect of mandibular tongue cribs on dentoskeletal changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
    Meibodi SE, Meybodi SA, Meybodi EM.
    World J Orthod; 2010 Jan; 11(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 20209173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, George C, Kaczynski R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F, Nalbantgil D, Sayinsu K, Arun T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions.
    Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, Komposch G.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):674-85. PubMed ID: 14719732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion.
    Das UM, Reddy D.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010 Dec; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Finite element morphometry of the midfacial complex in subjects with Angle's Class III malocclusions.
    Singh GD, McNamara JA, Lozanoff S.
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1997 Dec; 17(3):112-20. PubMed ID: 9338854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yassaei S, Jamilian A, Joshan N.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014 Dec; 25(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 25745712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ, Burden D, Conradt C, Komposch G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.