These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
381 related items for PubMed ID: 12401050
1. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion. Rodrigues de Almeida M, Castanha Henriques JF, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Ursi W. Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample. Almeida MR, Henriques JF, Almeida RR, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Ursi W. Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion. Das UM, Reddy D. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010 Feb; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition. de Almeida MR, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, Weber U, McNamara JA. Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):540-7. PubMed ID: 16097222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. de Oliveira JN, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Rodrigues de Almeida M, de Oliveira JN. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes. Wigal TG, Dischinger T, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance. Altug Z, Arslan AD. Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [An eight-factor analysis of early skeletal Class II malocclusion using Fränkel appliance]. Lai W, Lu S, Huang N, Zhao M. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 17(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 12539305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance. Aslan BI, Dinçer M. Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Bilgiç F, Hamamci O, Başaran G. Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances. Burkhardt DR, McNamara JA, Baccetti T. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Toth LR, McNamara JA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion. Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R, Amiri SS. Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]