These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

186 related items for PubMed ID: 12405585

  • 1. Self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material: two-year clinical evaluation.
    Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Vazquez O, Watson RE, Wilson N.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(5):296-302. PubMed ID: 12405585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
    Gordan VV, Shen C, Watson RE, Mjor IA.
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV, Blaser PK, Watson RE, Mjör IA, McEdward DL, Sensi LG, Riley JL.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years.
    Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Watson RE, Garvan C, Mjör IA.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 17473040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C, Rêgo HM, Perote LC, Santos LF, Kamozaki MB, Gutierrez NC, Di Nicoló R, Borges AB.
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a nanohybrid and a flowable resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results.
    Karaman E, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B.
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 22724113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
    van Dijken JW, Pallesen U.
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques.
    Monteiro PM, Manso MC, Gavinha S, Melo P.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Mar; 141(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 20194388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
    Arhun N, Celik C, Yamanel K.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Mar; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May 01; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH, Klein-Júnior CA, Camargo JC, Beskow T, Balestrin MD, Demarco FF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar 01; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct 01; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite.
    Türkün LS, Türkün M, Ozata F.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Sep 01; 134(9):1205-12. PubMed ID: 14528992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Three-year Clinical Performance of Two Giomer Restorative Materials in Restorations.
    Ozer F, Irmak O, Yakymiv O, Mohammed A, Pande R, Saleh N, Blatz M.
    Oper Dent; 2021 Jan 01; 46(1):E60-E67. PubMed ID: 33882138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun 01; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.