These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

377 related items for PubMed ID: 12407476

  • 1. Did the London Initiative Zone investment programme affect general practice structure and performance in East London? A time series analysis of cervical screening coverage and asthma prescribing.
    Naish J, Eldridge S, Moser K, Sturdy P.
    Public Health; 2002 Nov; 116(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12407476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Lessons from the London Initiative Zone Educational Incentives funding: associations between practice characteristics, funding, and courses undertaken.
    Hull SA, Tissier J, Moser K, Derrett CJ, Carter YH, Eldridge S.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Mar; 50(452):183-7. PubMed ID: 10750225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Characteristics of general practices involved in undergraduate medical teaching.
    Gray RW, Carter YH, Hull SA, Sheldon MG, Ball C.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 May; 51(466):371-4. PubMed ID: 11360701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Exploring the effects of population mobility on cervical screening coverage.
    Millett C, Bardsley M, Binysh K.
    Public Health; 2002 Nov; 116(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 12407475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Primary care. LIZ (London Initiative Zone): a legacy for London.
    Lewis R, Williams S.
    Health Serv J; 1998 Oct 01; 108(5624):24-7. PubMed ID: 10187264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R.
    Acta Med Port; 2008 Oct 01; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Practice size and quality attainment under the new GMS contract: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Wang Y, O'Donnell CA, Mackay DF, Watt GC.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Nov 01; 56(532):830-5. PubMed ID: 17132349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. RCGP Quality Team Development programme: an illuminative evaluation.
    Macfarlane F, Greenhalgh T, Schofield T, Desombre T.
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Oct 01; 13(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 15465939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
    Goldzweig CL, Parkerton PH, Washington DL, Lanto AB, Yano EM.
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr 01; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Physician performance assessment: nonequivalence of primary care measures.
    Parkerton PH, Smith DG, Belin TR, Feldbau GA.
    Med Care; 2003 Sep 01; 41(9):1034-47. PubMed ID: 12972843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of indicators assessing the quality of drug prescribing for asthma.
    Veninga CC, Denig P, Pont LG, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM.
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Apr 01; 36(1 Pt 1):143-61. PubMed ID: 11324741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Achievement of metabolic targets for diabetes by English primary care practices under a new system of incentives.
    Gulliford MC, Ashworth M, Robotham D, Mohiddin A.
    Diabet Med; 2007 May 01; 24(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 17381507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The management for tuberculosis control in Greater London in comparison with that in Osaka City: lessons for improvement of TB control management in Osaka City urban setting.
    Ohkado A, Williams G, Ishikawa N, Shimouchi A, Simon C.
    Health Policy; 2005 Jul 01; 73(1):104-23. PubMed ID: 15911061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Setting standards of prescribing performance in primary care: use of a consensus group of general practitioners and application of standards to practices in the north of England.
    Bateman DN, Eccles M, Campbell M, Soutter J, Roberts SJ, Smith JM.
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Jan 01; 46(402):20-5. PubMed ID: 8745847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Is the quality of care in general medical practice improving? Results of a longitudinal observational study.
    Campbell S, Steiner A, Robison J, Webb D, Raven A, Roland M.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Apr 01; 53(489):298-304. PubMed ID: 12879830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The efficacy of a national Family Health Services Authority based cervical cytology system.
    Amery J, Beardow R, Oerton J, Victor C.
    Health Trends; 1992 Apr 01; 24(4):119-22. PubMed ID: 10123981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Forty-eight hour access to primary care: practice factors predicting patients' perceptions.
    Campbell JL, Ramsay J, Green J, Harvey K.
    Fam Pract; 2005 Jun 01; 22(3):266-8. PubMed ID: 15778237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Adherence to guidelines on cervical cancer screening in general practice: programme elements of successful implementation.
    Hermens RP, Hak E, Hulscher ME, Braspenning JC, Grol RP.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Nov 01; 51(472):897-903. PubMed ID: 11761203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
    Webb R, Richardson J, Pickles A.
    J Med Screen; 2004 Nov 01; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.