These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


241 related items for PubMed ID: 12414165

  • 1. How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when aspecific serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing.
    Godfroid J, Saegerman C, Wellemans V, Walravens K, Letesson JJ, Tibor A, Mc Millan A, Spencer S, Sanna M, Bakker D, Pouillot R, Garin-Bastuji B.
    Vet Microbiol; 2002 Dec 20; 90(1-4):461-77. PubMed ID: 12414165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9. III. Specificity of the in vitro antigen-specific gamma interferon test for bovine brucellosis diagnosis in experimentally Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9-infected cattle.
    Kittelberger R, Reichel MP, Joyce MA, Staak C.
    Vet Microbiol; 1997 Oct 16; 57(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 9444073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants.
    Kittelberger R, Hilbink F, Hansen MF, Ross GP, Joyce MA, Fenwick S, Heesemann J, Wolf-Watz H, Nielsen K.
    Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec 16; 47(3-4):271-80. PubMed ID: 8748542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Performance of skin tests with allergens from B. melitensis B115 and rough B. abortus mutants for diagnosing swine brucellosis.
    Dieste-Pérez L, Blasco JM, De Miguel MJ, Marín CM, Barberán M, Conde-Álvarez R, Moriyón I, Muñoz PM.
    Vet Microbiol; 2014 Jan 10; 168(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 24331743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Efficacy of several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of false-positive serological results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Muñoz PM, Marín CM, Monreal D, González D, Garin-Bastuji B, Díaz R, Mainar-Jaime RC, Moriyón I, Blasco JM.
    Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2005 Jan 10; 12(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 15642999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and yersinia enterocolitica 0:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections.
    Kittelberger R, Bundesen PG, Cloeckaert A, Greiser-Wilke I, Letesson JJ.
    Vet Microbiol; 1998 Feb 15; 60(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 9595626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The use of skin delayed-type hypersensitivity as an adjunct test to diagnose brucellosis in cattle: a review.
    Bercovich Z.
    Vet Q; 2000 Jul 15; 22(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10952440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Infection of cattle with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 a cause of the false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis diagnostic tests.
    Weynants V, Tibor A, Denoel PA, Saegerman C, Godfroid J, Thiange P, Letesson JJ.
    Vet Microbiol; 1996 Jan 15; 48(1-2):101-12. PubMed ID: 8701566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Differentiation of Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 09 infections in cattle: the use of specific lymphocyte transformation and brucellin skin tests.
    Chukwu CC.
    Vet Q; 1987 Apr 15; 9(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 3113038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Specificity dependence between serological tests for diagnosing bovine brucellosis in Brucella-free farms showing false positive serological reactions due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Mainar-Jaime RC, Muñoz PM, de Miguel MJ, Grilló MJ, Marín CM, Moriyón I, Blasco JM.
    Can Vet J; 2005 Oct 15; 46(10):913-6. PubMed ID: 16454384
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.
    Riber U, Jungersen G.
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2007 Mar 15; 116(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 17270281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. False positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis: evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in a field trial.
    Gerbier G, Garin-Bastuji B, Pouillot R, Véry P, Cau C, Berr V, Dufour B, Moutou F.
    Vet Res; 1997 Mar 15; 28(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 9257445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Garin-Bastuji B, Hummel N, Gerbier G, Cau C, Pouillot R, Da Costa M, Fontaine JJ.
    Vet Microbiol; 1999 Apr 19; 66(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 10227124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Dutch Brucella abortus monitoring programme for cattle: the impact of false-positive serological reactions and comparison of serological tests.
    Emmerzaal A, de Wit JJ, Dijkstra T, Bakker D, van Zijderveld FG.
    Vet Q; 2002 Feb 19; 24(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11924560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Validation of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibody against Brucella abortus in cattle sera using an automated ELISA workstation.
    Paweska JT, Potts AD, Harris HJ, Smith SJ, Viljoen GJ, Dungu B, Brett OL, Bubb M, Prozesky L.
    Onderstepoort J Vet Res; 2002 Mar 19; 69(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 12092779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 I immunoblot analysis of the antibody response to Brucella protein antigens in bovine brucellosis.
    Kittelberger R, Hilbink F, Hansen MF, Penrose M, de Lisle GW, Letesson JJ, Garin-Bastuji B, Searson J, Fossati CA, Cloeckaert A.
    Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec 19; 47(3-4):257-70. PubMed ID: 8748541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study.
    Trotta A, Marinaro M, Cirilli M, Sposato A, Adone R, Beverelli M, Buonavoglia D, Corrente M.
    BMC Vet Res; 2020 Feb 11; 16(1):50. PubMed ID: 32046738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Brucella suis biovar 2 isolations from cattle in Poland.
    Szulowski K, Iwaniak W, Weiner M, Złotnicka J.
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2013 Feb 11; 20(4):672-5. PubMed ID: 24364432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Differentiation of the serologicl response to Yersinia enterocolitica and Brucella abortus in cattle.
    Corbel MJ, Cullen GA.
    J Hyg (Lond); 1970 Dec 11; 68(4):519-30. PubMed ID: 4992575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.