These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 12421260

  • 1. Efficacy and safety of rectal thiopental, intramuscular cocktail and rectal midazolam for sedation in children undergoing neuroimaging.
    Alp H, Orbak Z, Güler I, Altinkaynak S.
    Pediatr Int; 2002 Dec; 44(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 12421260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Rectal thiopental versus an intramuscular cocktail for sedating children before computerized tomography.
    Burckart GJ, White TJ, Siegle RL, Jabbour JT, Ramey DR.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Feb; 37(2):222-4. PubMed ID: 7361794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Rectal thiopental compared with intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for pediatric sedation.
    O'Brien JF, Falk JL, Carey BE, Malone LC.
    Ann Emerg Med; 1991 Jun; 20(6):644-7. PubMed ID: 2039103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Sedation for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: efficacy and safety of rectal thiopental.
    Beekman RP, Hoorntje TM, Beek FJ, Kuijten RH.
    Eur J Pediatr; 1996 Sep; 155(9):820-2. PubMed ID: 8874120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Efficacy and safety of rectal thiopental: sedation for children undergoing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Alp H, Güler I, Orbak Z, Karakelleoğlu C, Tan H, Eren S.
    Pediatr Int; 1999 Oct; 41(5):538-41. PubMed ID: 10530069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Oral ketamine/midazolam is superior to intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for pediatric cardiac catheterization.
    Auden SM, Sobczyk WL, Solinger RE, Goldsmith LJ.
    Anesth Analg; 2000 Feb; 90(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 10648310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Pediatric imaging: sedation with an injection formulation modified for rectal administration.
    Nguyen MT, Greenberg SB, Fitzhugh KR, Glasier CM.
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):760-2. PubMed ID: 11719673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of sevoflurane administered through a face mask versus rectal thiopental sodium in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.
    Gómez-Ríos MÁ, Freire-Vila E, Kuczkowski KM, Pensado-Castiñeiras A.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Feb; 30(4):437-441. PubMed ID: 27053335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Ketamine and midazolam for invasive procedures in children with malignancy: a comparison of routes of intravenous, oral, and rectal administration.
    Ozdemir D, Kayserili E, Arslanoglu S, Gulez P, Vergin C.
    J Trop Pediatr; 2004 Aug; 50(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 15357562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Oral sedation with midazolam and diphenhydramine compared with midazolam alone in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.
    Cengiz M, Baysal Z, Ganidagli S.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Jun; 16(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 16719877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Low dose of rectal thiopental sodium for pediatric sedation in spiral computed tomography study.
    Akhlaghpoor S, Shabestari AA, Moghdam MS.
    Pediatr Int; 2007 Jun; 49(3):387-91. PubMed ID: 17532841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients.
    Chowdhury J, Vargas KG.
    Pediatr Dent; 2005 Jun; 27(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16173222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Subcutaneous Midazolam with and without Ketamine for Sedation In Children Undergoing Dental Treatment: A Pilot Study.
    Flores-Castillo D, Martínez-Rider R, Ruiz-Rodríguez S, Garrocho-Rangel A, Lara-Guevara J, Pozos-Guillén A.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 39(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 26161612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of rectal thiopental sedation in outpatient echocardiographic examination of children.
    Okutan V, Lenk MK, Sarici SU, Dündaröz R, Akin R, Gökçay E.
    Acta Paediatr; 2000 Nov; 89(11):1340-3. PubMed ID: 11106047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Lytic cocktail in children. Rectal versus intramuscular administration.
    Laub M, Sjøgren P, Holm-Knudsen R, Flachs H, Christiansen E.
    Anaesthesia; 1990 Feb; 45(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 2321713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Intranasal sufentanil/midazolam versus ketamine/midazolam for analgesia/sedation in the pediatric population prior to undergoing multiple dental extractions under general anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind, randomized comparison.
    Roelofse JA, Shipton EA, de la Harpe CJ, Blignaut RJ.
    Anesth Prog; 2004 Feb; 51(4):114-21. PubMed ID: 15675259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Rectal thiopental sodium for sedation of pediatric patients undergoing MR and other imaging studies.
    Glasier CM, Stark JE, Brown R, James CA, Allison JW.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1995 Jan; 16(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 7900578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of oral diazepam versus midazolam, administered with intravenous meperidine, as premedication to sedation for pediatric endoscopy.
    Martinez JL, Sutters KA, Waite S, Davis J, Medina E, Montano N, Merzel D, Marquez C.
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2002 Jul; 35(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 12142810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Efficacy and safety of a mixture of ketamine, midazolam and atropine for procedural sedation in paediatric oncology: a randomised study of oral versus intramuscular route.
    Bhatnagar S, Mishra S, Gupta M, Srikanti M, Mondol A, Diwedi A.
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2008 Apr; 44(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 17927726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.