These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

217 related items for PubMed ID: 12430033

  • 1. [Two years experience with the new accommodative 1 CU intraocular lens].
    Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, Gusek-Schneider GC, Seitz B.
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Nov; 99(11):820-4. PubMed ID: 12430033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [First results of implantation of a new, potentially accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens].
    Küchle M, Langenbucher A, Gusek-Schneider GC, Seitz B, Hanna KD.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Sep; 218(9):603-8. PubMed ID: 11590468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses.
    Küchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Gusek-Schneider GC, Martus P, Nguyen NX, Erlangen Accommodative Intraocular Lens Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 15019382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.
    Dogru M, Honda R, Omoto M, Toda I, Fujishima H, Arai H, Matsuyama M, Nishijima S, Hida Y, Yagi Y, Tsubota K.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 15975453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.
    Harman FE, Maling S, Kampougeris G, Langan L, Khan I, Lee N, Bloom PA.
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
    Ossma IL, Galvis A, Vargas LG, Trager MJ, Vagefi MR, McLeod SD.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens.
    Hancox J, Spalton D, Heatley C, Jayaram H, Marshall J.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1098-103. PubMed ID: 16857494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes.
    Cleary G, Spalton DJ, Gala KB.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):619-627.e1. PubMed ID: 20719298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens.
    Heatley CJ, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, Kumar A, Marshall J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 15992754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses.
    Claoué C.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2088-91. PubMed ID: 15474819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [The clinical efficacy of accommodative intraocular lens and multifocal intraocular lens in pseudophakic after phacoemulsification].
    Xu M, Li WS, Zhao YE, Wang QM.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 43(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 17459238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS, Hunt OA, Naroo S, Gilmartin B, Shah S, Cunliffe IA, Benson MT, Mantry S.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes.
    Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Koeppl C, Menapace R, Drexler W.
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 15745773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Performance of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens in relation to capsulorhexis size.
    Vargas LG, Auffarth GU, Becker KA, Rabsilber TM, Holzer MP.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Feb; 31(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 15767160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens].
    Wang J, Fu J, Wang NL, Kang HJ, Yang WL.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 41(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 16191347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Miyake-Apple video analysis of movement patterns of an accommodative intraocular lens implant].
    Auffarth GU, Schmidbauer J, Becker KA, Rabsilber TM, Apple DJ.
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Nov; 99(11):811-4. PubMed ID: 12430031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Longterm results of 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens implantation: 2-year follow-up study.
    Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Falconio G, Nubile M, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Di Nicola M, Ballone E.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Jun; 85(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 17403026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept.
    Alió JL, Ben-nun J, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Plaza AB.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 19781458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Long-term clinical observation of an accommodative 1CU after implantation].
    Liu XQ, Li MF, Guo MH, Chen L.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 May; 46(5):415-8. PubMed ID: 20654214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Hancox J, Spalton D, Heatley C, Jayaram H, Yip J, Boyce J, Marshall J.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 17321391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.