These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

434 related items for PubMed ID: 12430820

  • 1. The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.
    Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2086-98. PubMed ID: 12430820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA, Freyman RL.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Arbogast TL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1367-76. PubMed ID: 11931314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA, Fortune TW.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Combining energetic and informational masking for speech identification.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Gallun FJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):982-92. PubMed ID: 16158654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G, Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Walsh M.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 3(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 12162362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Release from masking due to spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Rohtla TL, Deliwala PS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):422-31. PubMed ID: 9670534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS, Zeng FG, Litovsky R, Assmann P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Alcántara JI, Moore BC.
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):103-16. PubMed ID: 12031520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of frequency selectivity on comodulation masking release in normal-hearing listeners.
    Hall JW, Grose JH, Moore BC.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):410-23. PubMed ID: 8487531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH, Trivette CP, Williams DA, Watts KL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Mar; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ, Yarnell Bonino A, Buss E.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Mar; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Psychometric functions for informational masking.
    Lutfi RA, Kistler DJ, Callahan MR, Wightman FL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3273-82. PubMed ID: 14714808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.