These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

447 related items for PubMed ID: 12439475

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
    Bendeus M, Hägg U, Rabie B.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI, Dinçer M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P, Baccetti T, Mucedero M, Pavoni C, Franchi L.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M, Torget O, Vandevska-Radunovic V.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.
    Croft RS, Buschang PH, English JD, Meyer R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.