These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
188 related items for PubMed ID: 12449307
1. A concept for a biologically derived, parabolic implant design. Holt RL, Rosenberg MM, Zinser PJ, Ganeles J. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Oct; 22(5):473-81. PubMed ID: 12449307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Achieving and maintaining predictable implant esthetics through the maintenance of bone around dental implants. Stanford CM. Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Sep; 23(9 Suppl 2):13-20. PubMed ID: 12790009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. Gardner DM. N Y State Dent J; 2005 Apr; 71(3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16013682 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A new concept for optimizing soft tissue integration. Touati B, Rompen E, Van Dooren E. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 17(10):711-2, 714-5. PubMed ID: 16506613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Apr; 25(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 15839587 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of crestal bone level at platform-switched non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. Becker J, Ferrari D, Mihatovic I, Sahm N, Schaer A, Schwarz F. J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 19508252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional bone and soft tissue requirements for optimizing esthetic results in compromised cases with multiple implants. Ishikawa T, Salama M, Funato A, Kitajima H, Moroi H, Salama H, Garber D. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Oct; 30(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 20814604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone level dental implant versus gingival crest level implant. Fernandes A. Dent Today; 2011 Jun; 30(6):72-3. PubMed ID: 21761630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A new implant design for optimal esthetics and retention of interproximal papillae. Gadhia MH, Holt RL. Implant Dent; 2003 Jun; 12(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 12861885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Su H, Gonzalez-Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 20664835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Light-microscopic evaluation of the dimensions of peri-implant mucosa around immediately loaded and submerged titanium implants in monkeys. Quaranta A, Piattelli A, Scarano A, Quaranta M, Pompa G, Iezzi G. J Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 79(9):1697-703. PubMed ID: 18771371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants. Degidi M, Perrotti V, Shibli JA, Novaes AB, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 21138355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant. Nevins M, Nevins ML, Camelo M, Boyesen JL, Kim DM. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 18546807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants. Pecora GE, Ceccarelli R, Bonelli M, Alexander H, Ricci JL. Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 19212238 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Jan; 34(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 17137467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]