These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
424 related items for PubMed ID: 12457136
1. [Second trimester cerclage of short cervixes: which technique to use? A retrospective study of 25 cases]. Perrotin F, Marret H, Ayeva-Derman M, Alonso AM, Lansac J, Body G. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Nov; 31(7):640-8. PubMed ID: 12457136 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. McDonald versus Shirodkar cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth: impact of body mass index. Figueroa R, Crowell R, Martinez A, Morgan M, Wakefield D. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(20):3408-3414. PubMed ID: 29712493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Indications for and pregnancy outcomes of cervical cerclage: 11-year comparison of patients undergoing history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated, or rescue cerclage. Chan LL, Leung TW, Lo TK, Lau WL, Leung WC. Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 26183455 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length. Odibo AO, Berghella V, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM, Nicolaides KH. Am J Perinatol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 17195146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a new technique of prophylactic cervical cerclage simplified from the Shirodkar cerclage: A pilot study. Bartolo S, Garabedian C, Deruelle P, Debarge V, Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Subtil D. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 46(4):343-347. PubMed ID: 28643662 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of clinical effect of McDonald cervical cerclage and the related risk factors]. Sun X, Ding XP, Shi CY, Yang HX, Jin YZ. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 51(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 26917475 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Should it really be called a heroic cerclage? The obstetrical results of emergency late second-trimester cerclage compared with early history-indicated elective cerclage: a retrospective trial. Mor M, Levi A, Rafaeli-Yehudai T, Ezratty J, Shiber Y, Smorgick N, Vaknin Z. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Aug; 310(2):1121-1129. PubMed ID: 37773465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two cervical cerclages for the prevention of preterm birth and neonatal complications. Wong CH, Chen CP, Wang KG, Sun FJ, Chen CY. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Mar; 30(5):551-555. PubMed ID: 27072547 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value of cervical cerclage in patients at risk of premature delivery]. Perrotin F, Lansac J, Body G. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Nov; 31(7 Suppl):5S66-73. PubMed ID: 12454628 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Shirodkar cerclage: Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in a single-center cohort of 55 cases. Bloomfield J, Pénager C, Mandelbrot L. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Nov; 50(9):102152. PubMed ID: 33887533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Knot positioning during McDonald cervical cerclage, does it make a difference? A cohort study. Atia H, Ellaithy M, Altraigey A, Ibrahim H. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3757-3763. PubMed ID: 29764255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bridge Suture for Successful McDonald Emergency Cerclage. Tanaka M, Hori Y, Shirafuji A, Kato M, Kato J, Kobayashi H, Tsuchida T, Fukae T. Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017 Nov; 82(5):446-452. PubMed ID: 27771710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Emergency cervical cerclage. Does the gestational age make a difference? Eskandar MA, Sobande AA, Damole IO, Bahar AM. Saudi Med J; 2004 Aug; 25(8):1028-31. PubMed ID: 15322593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]