These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

753 related items for PubMed ID: 12462677

  • 1. Acquired atrioventricular block in a patient with sinus node disease on single-chamber atrial pacing.
    Vijayvergiya R, Grover A.
    Indian Heart J; 2002; 54(4):435-6. PubMed ID: 12462677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease.
    Sweeney MO, Bank AJ, Nsah E, Koullick M, Zeng QC, Hettrick D, Sheldon T, Lamas GA, Search AV Extension and Managed Ventricular Pacing for Promoting Atrioventricular Conduction (SAVE PACe) Trial.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Sep 06; 357(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 17804844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias.
    Sethi KK, Bajaj V, Mohan JC, Arora R, Khalilullah M.
    Indian Heart J; 1990 Sep 06; 42(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 2258196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Single chamber atrial pacing: a realistic option in sinus node disease: a long-term follow-up study of 213 patients.
    Höijer CJ, Höglund P, Schüller H, Brandt J.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jun 06; 30(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 17547606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
    Gillis AM, Pürerfellner H, Israel CW, Sunthorn H, Kacet S, Anelli-Monti M, Tang F, Young M, Boriani G, Medtronic Enrhythm Clinical Study Investigators.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul 06; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
    Brandt J, Anderson H, Fåhraeus T, Schüller H.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep 06; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators.
    Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS, Ellenbogen KA, Sgarbossa EB, Huang SK, Marinchak RA, Estes NA, Mitchell GF, Lieberman EH, Mangione CM, Goldman L.
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr 16; 338(16):1097-104. PubMed ID: 9545357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Single-chamber versus dual-chamber pacing for high-grade atrioventricular block.
    Toff WD, Camm AJ, Skehan JD, United Kingdom Pacing and Cardiovascular Events Trial Investigators.
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Jul 14; 353(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 16014884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Dynamic and dual-site atrial pacing in the prevention of atrial fibrillation: The STimolazione Atrial DInamica Multisito (STADIM) Study.
    De Simone A, Senatore G, Donnici G, Turco P, Romano E, Gazzola C, Stabile G.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan 14; 30 Suppl 1():S71-4. PubMed ID: 17302722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction.
    Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Silverman R, Leon A, Yee R, Marinchak RA, Flaker G, Schron E, Orav EJ, Hellkamp AS, Greer S, McAnulty J, Ellenbogen K, Ehlert F, Freedman RA, Estes NA, Greenspon A, Goldman L, Mode Selection Trial in Sinus-Node Dysfunction.
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Jun 13; 346(24):1854-62. PubMed ID: 12063369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Atrial vs. dual-chamber cardiac pacing in sinus node disease: a register-based cohort study.
    Fored CM, Granath F, Gadler F, Blomqvist P, Rynder J, Linde C, Ekbom A, Rosenqvist M.
    Europace; 2008 Jul 13; 10(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 18467299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Long-term reliability of AAI mode pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction and low Wenckebach block rate.
    Adachi M, Igawa O, Yano A, Miake J, Inoue Y, Ogura K, Kato M, Iitsuka K, Hisatome I.
    Europace; 2008 Feb 13; 10(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 18199569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome.
    Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T, Pedersen AK.
    Lancet; 1997 Oct 25; 350(9086):1210-6. PubMed ID: 9652562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.
    Dretzke J, Toff WD, Lip GY, Raftery J, Fry-Smith A, Taylor R.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004 Oct 25; 2004(2):CD003710. PubMed ID: 15106214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Atrial sensing and pacing with a single pass ventricular lead.
    Tse HF, Lau CP.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1998 Dec 25; 111(12):1118-23. PubMed ID: 11263378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 38.