These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

261 related items for PubMed ID: 12471627

  • 1. Prospective and randomised public-health trial on neural network-assisted screening for cervical cancer in Finland: results of the first year.
    Nieminen P, Hakama M, Viikki M, Tarkkanen J, Anttila A.
    Int J Cancer; 2003 Jan 20; 103(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 12471627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team.
    Lancet; 1999 Apr 24; 353(9162):1381-5. PubMed ID: 10227217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
    Doornewaard H, van der Schouw YT, van der Graaf Y, Bos AB, Habbema JD, van den Tweel JG.
    Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov 24; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P, Vuorma S, Viikki M, Hakama M, Anttila A.
    BJOG; 2004 Aug 24; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A randomised public-health trial on automation-assisted screening for cervical cancer in Finland: performance with 470,000 invitations.
    Nieminen P, Kotaniemi L, Hakama M, Tarkkanen J, Martikainen J, Toivonen T, Ikkala J, Luostarinen T, Anttila A.
    Int J Cancer; 2005 Jun 10; 115(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 15688388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Evaluation of PAPNET--a semiautomated system used in the screening against cervical cancer].
    Hølund B, Ejersbo D, Hjortebjerg A.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep 28; 160(40):5802-6. PubMed ID: 9782761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cost analysis of PAPNET-assisted vs. conventional Pap smear evaluation in primary screening of cervical smears.
    Meerding WJ, Doornewaard H, van Ballegooijen M, Bos A, van der Graaf Y, van den Tweel JG, van der Schouw YT, Habbema JD.
    Acta Cytol; 2001 Sep 28; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11213501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Consequences of neural network technology for cervical screening: increase in diagnostic consistency and positive scores.
    Kok MR, Boon ME.
    Cancer; 1996 Jul 01; 78(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 8646706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
    Rosenthal DL, Acosta D, Peters RK.
    Acta Cytol; 1996 Jul 01; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
    Sherman ME, Schiffman M, Herrero R, Kelly D, Bratti C, Mango LJ, Alfaro M, Hutchinson ML, Mena F, Hildesheim A, Morales J, Greenberg MD, Balmaceda I, Lorincz AT.
    Cancer; 1998 Oct 25; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece.
    Veneti S, Papaefthimiou M, Symiakaki H, Ioannidou-Mouzaka L.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 Oct 25; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Automated screening for quality control using PAPNET: a study of 638 negative Pap smears.
    Keyhani-Rofagha S, Palma T, O'Toole RV.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun 25; 14(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 8725131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
    Weissbrod D, Torres M, Rodríguez A, Ureña I, Estrada J, Reyes ME, Carreto AJ.
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec 25; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Rescreen effect in conventional and PAPNET screening: observed in a study using material enriched with positive smears.
    van Ballegooijen M, Beck S, Boon ME, Boer R, Habbema JD.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Dec 25; 42(5):1133-8. PubMed ID: 9755670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. PAPNET-assisted primary screening of conventional cervical smears.
    Cenci M, Nagar C, Vecchione A.
    Anticancer Res; 2000 Dec 25; 20(5C):3887-9. PubMed ID: 11268471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Observer variation in cytologic grading for cervical dysplasia of Papanicolaou smears with the PAPNET testing system.
    Doornewaard H, van der Schouw YT, van der Graaf Y, Bos AB, van den Tweel JG.
    Cancer; 1999 Aug 25; 87(4):178-83. PubMed ID: 10455204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. PAPNET for analysis of proliferating (MIB-1 positive) cell populations in cervical smears.
    Boon ME, Kleinschmidt-Guy ED, Ouwerkerk-Noordam E.
    Eur J Morphol; 1994 Mar 25; 32(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 8086271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Simulation of primary cervical cancer screening by the PAPNET system in an unscreened, high-risk community.
    Michelow PM, Hlongwane NF, Leiman G.
    Acta Cytol; 1997 Mar 25; 41(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 9022732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System).
    Koss LG, Sherman ME, Cohen MB, Anes AR, Darragh TM, Lemos LB, McClellan BJ, Rosenthal DL, Keyhani-Rofagha S, Schreiber K, Valente PT.
    Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct 25; 28(10):1196-203. PubMed ID: 9343327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory].
    Ghidoni D, Fabbris E, Folicaldi S, Amadori A, Medri M, Bucchi L, Bondi A.
    Pathologica; 1998 Aug 25; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.