These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

261 related items for PubMed ID: 12471627

  • 21. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge.
    Solomon HM, Frist S.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 9479348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of Papnet-assisted and manual screening of cervical smears.
    Losell K, Dejmek A.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 10495327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Consistency of a double PAPNET scan of cervical smears.
    Jenny J, Isenegger I, Boon ME, Husain OA.
    Acta Cytol; 1997 Oct; 41(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 9022731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. New paradigm for ASCUS diagnosis using neural networks.
    Kok MR, Habers MA, Schreiner-Kok PG, Boon ME.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Nov; 19(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 9812231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
    O'Leary TJ, Tellado M, Buckner SB, Ali IS, Stevens A, Ollayos CW.
    JAMA; 1998 Jan 21; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Neural network processing of cervical smears can lead to a decrease in diagnostic variability and an increase in screening efficacy: a study of 63 false-negative smears.
    Boon ME, Kok LP, Nygaard-Nielsen M, Holm K, Holund B.
    Mod Pathol; 1994 Dec 21; 7(9):957-61. PubMed ID: 7892166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
    Mango LJ, Valente PT.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Dec 21; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Dec 21; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Computer-assisted cervical cancer screening using neural networks.
    Mango LJ.
    Cancer Lett; 1994 Mar 15; 77(2-3):155-62. PubMed ID: 8168062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
    van der Aa MA, Pukkala E, Coebergh JW, Anttila A, Siesling S.
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr 15; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Quality control of cervical cytology in high-risk women. PAPNET system compared with manual rescreening.
    Bergeron C, Masseroli M, Ghezi A, Lemarie A, Mango L, Koss LG.
    Acta Cytol; 2000 Apr 15; 44(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 10740599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. A model for quality assessment in cervical cytology used as a screening test.
    Quantin C, Dusserre L, Montaud AM, Mottot C, Feldman JP.
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1992 Jun 15; 4(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 1511144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The PAPNET system for quality control of cervical smears: validation and limits.
    Cenci M, Nagar C, Giovagnoli MR, Vecchione A.
    Anticancer Res; 1997 Jun 15; 17(6D):4731-4. PubMed ID: 9494597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [An interlaboratory study of the use of PapNet in the quality control of cervico-vaginal cytology].
    Cosentino A, Ghidoni D, Salemi M, Folicaldi S, Amadori A, Zani J, Grasso G, Bondi A.
    Pathologica; 1999 Apr 15; 91(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 10484869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Papnet-assisted, primary screening of cervico-vaginal smears.
    Duggan MA.
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000 Apr 15; 21(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10726616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
    Mitchell H, Medley G.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Apr 15; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Potentially difficult smears of women with squamous cell carcinoma pose fewer problems when PAPNET is used for primary screening.
    Kok MR, Schreiner-Kok PG, Van Der Veen G, Boon ME.
    Cytopathology; 1999 Oct 15; 10(5):324-34. PubMed ID: 10588351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Computer-assisted primary screening of cervical smears using the PAPNET method: comparison with conventional screening and evaluation of the role of the cytologist.
    Ouwerkerk-Noordam E, Boon ME, Beck S.
    Cytopathology; 1994 Aug 15; 5(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 7948757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [The effectiveness of cervical cytology screening for cervical cancer (author's transl)].
    Soost HJ, Bockmühl B, Zock H.
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Sep 21; 104(38):1331-5. PubMed ID: 477559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Accuracy comparison between PAPNET diagnoses and conventional diagnoses in an Italian cervical cytology laboratory.
    Ghidoni D, Fabbris E, Folicaldi S, Amadori A, Medri M, Bucchi L, Bondi A.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Oct 21; 19(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9784992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.