These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

552 related items for PubMed ID: 12473998

  • 21. The influence of dentin and/or metal surface treatment on the retention of cemented crowns in teeth with an increased taper.
    Pilo R, Lewinstein I, Ratzon T, Cardash HS, Brosh T.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1058-64. PubMed ID: 18258295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I, Block L, Lehr Z, Ormianer Z, Matalon S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ, Connolly J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of metal type and surface treatment on in vitro tensile strength of copings cemented to minimally retentive preparations.
    Abreu A, Loza MA, Elias A, Mukhopadhyay S, Rueggeberg FA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 17854621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The retention of complete crowns prepared with three different tapers and luted with four different cements.
    Zidan O, Ferguson GC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 89(6):565-71. PubMed ID: 12815350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F, Savabi O, Shahtoosi M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Effect of luting cements on the compressive strength of Turkom-Cera all-ceramic copings.
    Al-Makramani BM, Razak AA, Abu-Hassan MI.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb 01; 9(2):33-40. PubMed ID: 18264523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Woelfel JB.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998 Feb 01; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Evaluation of load at fracture of Procera AllCeram copings using different luting cements.
    Al-Makramani BMA, Razak AAA, Abu-Hassan MI.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb 01; 17(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 18047490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effect of thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage on retentive strengths of luting cements for zirconia crowns.
    Ehlers V, Kampf G, Stender E, Willershausen B, Ernst CP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun 01; 113(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 25794911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE, Richards LC, Abbott JR.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec 01; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
    Kokubo Y, Kano T, Tsumita M, Sakurai S, Itayama A, Fukushima S.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan 01; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
    Oyagüe RC, Sánchez-Turrión A, López-Lozano JF, Suárez-García MJ.
    J Dent; 2012 Feb 01; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Retentiveness of metal coping luted to teeth of uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis using five different luting cements.
    Ghazy MH, Aboumadina MM, Mahmoud SH.
    Oper Dent; 2014 Feb 01; 39(3):E101-8. PubMed ID: 24191870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P, Gultekin BA, Aydin M, Yalcin S.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb 01; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A, Ludwig K, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep 01; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug 01; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system.
    Clayton GH, Driscoll CF, Hondrum SO.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997 Aug 01; 12(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 9337028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. In vitro comparisons of casting retention on implant abutments among commercially available and experimental castor oil-containing dental luting agents.
    Pinelli LA, Fais LM, Ricci WA, Reis JM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May 01; 109(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 23684282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The effect of die spacer on retention and fitting of complete cast crowns.
    Olivera AB, Saito T.
    J Prosthodont; 2006 May 01; 15(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 16827737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.