These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

94 related items for PubMed ID: 12474832

  • 21. Considerations for research ethics boards in evaluating qualitative studies: lessons from an ethnographic study with adolescent females.
    Banister E.
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 2002 Dec; 35(8 Suppl.):567-70. PubMed ID: 15015502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Rules of the game: institutional review boards.
    Lubowitz JH, Poehling GG, Burkhart SS.
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):373-4. PubMed ID: 18375265
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Medical research-ethics applied to social sciences: relevance, limits, issues and necessary adjustments].
    Desclaux A.
    Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2008 Apr; 101(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18543697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Adjudicating entitlements: the emerging discourses of research ethics boards.
    Whittaker E.
    Health (London); 2005 Oct; 9(4):513-35. PubMed ID: 16144791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Caregivers as subjects of clinical drug trials: a review of human subjects protection practices in published studies of Alzheimer's disease pharmacotherapies.
    Lingler JH, Parker LS, DeKosky ST, Schulz R.
    IRB; 2006 Oct; 28(3):11-8. PubMed ID: 17036439
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Reducing the burden on many institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 15119341
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. New guidance on reviews by central institutional review boards (IRBs).
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 May; 20(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 16175714
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Recommendations for federal "super agency" would affect institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 12530378
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Ethics in social sciences and health research: a draft code of conduct.
    Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes, BMC bldg, 135 Military road, Bamandayapada, Marol, Andheri (E), Mumbai 400059, India.
    Issues Med Ethics; 2000 Feb; 8(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 16323346
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. When is research really research? Academic physicians push to keep oversight of most quality-improvement projects away from institutional review boards.
    Brainard J.
    Chron High Educ; 2004 Nov 26; LI(14):A21. PubMed ID: 15675071
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.