These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

208 related items for PubMed ID: 12493044

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fetal outcome when the ultrasound estimate of the day of delivery is more than 14 days later than the last menstrual period estimate.
    Tunón K, Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 10461333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The biologic error in gestational length related to the use of the first day of last menstrual period as a proxy for the start of pregnancy.
    Nakling J, Buhaug H, Backe B.
    Early Hum Dev; 2005 Oct; 81(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 16084037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Determination of the expected day of delivery--ultrasound has not been shown to be more accurate than the calendar method].
    Olsen O, Clausen JA.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Mar 30; 160(14):2088-90. PubMed ID: 9604677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Conceptional age, menstrual age, and ultrasound age: a second-trimester comparison of pregnancies of known conception date with pregnancies dated from the last menstrual period.
    Rossavik IK, Fishburne JI.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb 30; 73(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 2643067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The impact of fetal, maternal and external factors on prediction of the day of delivery by the use of ultrasound.
    Tunón K, Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb 30; 11(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 9549835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome.
    Oh JS, Wright G, Coulam CB.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep 30; 20(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12230450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule?
    Nguyen TH, Larsen T, Engholm G, Møller H.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul 30; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 10461334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Bedsharing and maternal smoking in a population-based survey of new mothers.
    Lahr MB, Rosenberg KD, Lapidus JA.
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct 30; 116(4):e530-42. PubMed ID: 16199682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.