These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 12498354

  • 1. Stability of memory traces for speech sounds in cochlear implant patients.
    Salo S, Peltola MS, Aaltonen O, Johansson R, Lang AH, Laurikainen E.
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2002; 27(3):132-8. PubMed ID: 12498354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S, Zhang Y, Nelson P.
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F, Lehmann A.
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Language-specific, hearing-related changes in vowel spaces: a preliminary study of English- and Spanish-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Perkell J, Numa W, Vick J, Lane H, Balkany T, Gould J.
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 11770669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effects of changes in hearing status in cochlear implant users on the acoustic vowel space and CV coarticulation.
    Lane H, Matthies M, Perkell J, Vick J, Zandipour M.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):552-63. PubMed ID: 11407560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mandarin compound vowels produced by prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Yang J, Xu L.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():143-149. PubMed ID: 28483225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Covariation of cochlear implant users' perception and production of vowel contrasts and their identification by listeners with normal hearing.
    Vick JC, Lane H, Perkell JS, Matthies ML, Gould J, Zandipour M.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1257-67. PubMed ID: 11776363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of auditory feedback deprivation length on the vowel /epsilon/ produced by pediatric cochlear-implant users.
    Bharadwaj SV, Graves AG, Bauer DD, Assmann PF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):EL196-202. PubMed ID: 17550203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Vowel recognition via cochlear implants and noise vocoders: effects of formant movement and duration.
    Iverson P, Smith CA, Evans BG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3998-4006. PubMed ID: 17225426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of telepractice on pediatric cochlear implant users and provider vowel space: A preliminary report.
    Kondaurova MV, Zheng Q, Donaldson CW, Smith AF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):467. PubMed ID: 36732236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Input to verbal working memory: Preattentive construction of the central speech representation.
    Jacobsen T, Schröger E.
    Exp Psychol; 2004 Jan; 51(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 15620224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mismatch negativity to frequency changes: no evidence from human event-related brain potentials for categorical speech processing of complex tones resembling vowel formant structure.
    Jacobsen T.
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 May 27; 362(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 15158015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Langereis MC, Bosman AJ, van Olphen AF, Smoorenburg GF.
    Audiology; 1997 May 27; 36(5):279-97. PubMed ID: 9305524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of deafness on acoustic characteristics of American English tense/lax vowels in maternal speech to infants.
    Kondaurova MV, Bergeson TR, Dilley LC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug 27; 132(2):1039-49. PubMed ID: 22894224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Changes in speech intelligibility of postlingually deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
    Gould J, Lane H, Vick J, Perkell JS, Matthies ML, Zandipour M.
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec 27; 22(6):453-60. PubMed ID: 11770668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB, Won JH, Moon IJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Dec 27; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M, Hanekom JJ.
    J Commun Disord; 2013 Dec 27; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Automatic discrimination of phonetically relevant and irrelevant vowel parameters as reflected by mismatch negativity.
    Aaltonen O, Eerola O, Lang AH, Uusipaikka E, Tuomainen J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep 27; 96(3):1489-93. PubMed ID: 7963013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Atypical central auditory speech-sound discrimination in children who stutter as indexed by the mismatch negativity.
    Jansson-Verkasalo E, Eggers K, Järvenpää A, Suominen K, Van den Bergh B, De Nil L, Kujala T.
    J Fluency Disord; 2014 Sep 27; 41():1-11. PubMed ID: 25066139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Phonetic training and non-native speech perception--New memory traces evolve in just three days as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and behavioural measures.
    Tamminen H, Peltola MS, Kujala T, Näätänen R.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jul 27; 97(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25956191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.