These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

275 related items for PubMed ID: 12498541

  • 1. CT data and its CAD and CAM utility in implant planning: part I.
    Voitik AJ.
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(6):302-3. PubMed ID: 12498541
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Surgical templates in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK.
    Dent Implantol Update; 2006 Jun; 17(6):41-4. PubMed ID: 16758934
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jun; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Interactive imaging for implant planning.
    Van Steenberghe D.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jun; 63(6):883-4; author reply 884. PubMed ID: 15944994
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Diagnostic templates for implant treatment planning.
    Garcia LT, Chung KH.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2003 May; 24(5):384-6, 388, 390. PubMed ID: 12793222
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reference-based digital concept to restore partially edentulous patients following an immediate loading protocol: a pilot study.
    Tahmaseb A, De Clerck R, Eckert S, Wismeijer D.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 May; 26(4):707-17. PubMed ID: 21841978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
    Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. CAD/CAM options in dental implant treatment planning.
    Morris JB.
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2010 May; 38(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 20572527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Restoring the partially edentulous patient in the aesthetic zone: computer-guided implant surgery.
    Abbo B, Razzoog ME.
    Dent Today; 2007 Jul; 26(7):136, 138-40; quiz 140, 128. PubMed ID: 17708323
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Interactive computerized tomography for dental implants. Treatment planning from the prosthetic end result.
    Tischler M.
    Dent Today; 2004 Mar; 23(3):90, 92-3. PubMed ID: 15060916
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Custom-made radiographic template, computed tomography, and computer-assisted flapless surgery for treatment planning in partial edentulous patients: a prospective 12-month study.
    Nikzad S, Azari A.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1353-9. PubMed ID: 20231051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
    Besimo CE, Lambrecht JT, Guindy JS.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study.
    Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Strbac G, Schemper M, Zechner W.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 21244498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept.
    Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF.
    J Prosthodont; 2006 Oct; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16433652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW, Ruprecht A, Yang J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ, Eitner S.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Implant treatment planning using a patient acceptance prosthesis, radiographic record base, and surgical template. Part 1: Presurgical phase.
    Amet EM, Ganz SD.
    Implant Dent; 1997 Jul; 6(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 9477783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.
    Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Jacobs R.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 20447264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of a computer-aided implant surgical technique.
    Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Calasso S.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013 Apr; 33(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 23593625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy evaluation of surgical guides in implant dentistry by non-contact reverse engineering techniques.
    Giordano M, Ausiello P, Martorelli M.
    Dent Mater; 2012 Sep; 28(9):e178-85. PubMed ID: 22796037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.