These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


62 related items for PubMed ID: 12515935

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
    Kalyvianaki MI, Kymionis GD, Kounis GA, Panagopoulou SI, Grentzelos MA, Pallikaris IG.
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Excimer laser subepithelial ablation (ELSA) or laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) - a new kerato-refractive procedure for myopia. Surgical technique and first clinical results on 24 eyes and 3 months follow-up].
    Lohmann CP, Winkler Von Mohrenfels C, Gabler B, Hermann W, Müller M.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Dec; 219(1-2):26-32. PubMed ID: 11932806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.
    Ghadhfan F, Al-Rajhi A, Wagoner MD.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2041-8. PubMed ID: 18053901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.
    Katsanevaki VJ, Kalyvianaki MI, Kavroulaki DS, Pallikaris IG.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 17320960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Clinical investigation of epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis on high myopia].
    Dai JH, Chen CD, Chu RY, Zhou XT, Qu XM, Wang XY, Yu ZQ, Zhang BH.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 15840360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia.
    Kim JK, Kim SS, Lee HK, Lee IS, Seong GJ, Kim EK, Han SH.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul; 30(7):1405-11. PubMed ID: 15210215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Cagil N, Aydin B, Ozturk S, Hasiripi H.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):642-7. PubMed ID: 17397737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Safety, efficacy, and stability indices of LASEK correction in moderate myopia and astigmatism.
    Taneri S, Feit R, Azar DT.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2130-7. PubMed ID: 15474826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Teus MA, de Benito-Llopis L, García-González M.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A prospective, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flap LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractive keratectomy.
    Slade SG, Durrie DS, Binder PS.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1075-82. PubMed ID: 19486798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Outcomes of epi-LASIK for the correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism after more than 1 year.
    Gan D, Zhou X, Dai J, Qu X, Yu Z, Zhou H, Wang X, Chu R.
    Ophthalmologica; 2009 Jun; 223(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 19052479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.