These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

213 related items for PubMed ID: 1252188

  • 1. Electrophysiological studies of the auditory system.
    Thornton AR.
    Audiology; 1976; 15(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 1252188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Electric response audiometry in a clinical practice.
    Brackmann DE.
    Laryngoscope; 1977 May; 87(5 Pt 2 Suppl 5):1-33. PubMed ID: 323607
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of hearing threshold determined by auditory pathway electric responses and by behavioural responses.
    Pratt H, Sohmer H.
    Audiology; 1978 May; 17(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 687235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Objective measures of cochlear frequency selectivity in animals and in man. A review.
    Harrison RV.
    Acta Neurol Belg; 1984 May; 84(5):213-32. PubMed ID: 6395611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Electric response audiometry: clinical applications.
    Brackmann DE, Selters WA.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Feb; 11(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 662358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Brain stem potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlea in human subjects.
    Starr A, Brackmann DE.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1979 Feb; 88(4 Pt 1):550-6. PubMed ID: 475255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Threshold sensitivity of the auditory pathway: effects of worsening signal-to-noise ratio in the auditory nerve.
    Leng G, Comis SD.
    Hear Res; 1981 Mar; 4(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 7204257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Auditory fatigue: retrocochlear components.
    Salvi R, Henderson D, Hamernick R.
    Science; 1975 Oct 31; 190(4213):486-7. PubMed ID: 1166320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. On the origin of the auditory averaged evoked responses recorded from the scalp in the anesthetized cat.
    Kevanishvili ZS, Kajaia OA.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1973 Oct 31; 76(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 4771958
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Current distributions in the cat cochlea: a modelling and electrophysiological study.
    O'Leary SJ, Black RC, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun 31; 18(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 3840160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fos-like immunoreactivity in the auditory brainstem evoked by bipolar intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of current level and pulse duration.
    Saito H, Miller JM, Pfingst BE, Altschuler RA.
    Neuroscience; 1999 Jun 31; 91(1):139-61. PubMed ID: 10336066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.