These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

393 related items for PubMed ID: 12524795

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of the Association Between the Tray and Impression Techniques on Angulated Implants Using the All-on-Four System.
    de Avila ED, Castanharo SM, Casalle N, Vasconcelos JA, de Assis Mollo F.
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():382-5. PubMed ID: 24641165
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
    Chang WG, Vahidi F, Bae KH, Lim BS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Al-Johani A, Clark RK, Juszczyk AS, Radford DR.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A quick esthetic remount cast for all-ceramic restorations.
    Hansen PA, Gist J.
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):494-6. PubMed ID: 20456029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Making a great impression.
    Mechanic E.
    Dent Today; 2010 Dec; 29(12):88, 90-1. PubMed ID: 21229926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK, Friel T, Taylor PD.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S, Varvara G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Laboratory work for restorative dentistry: model pouring and die preparation.
    Small BW.
    Gen Dent; 2012 Apr; 60(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 23220299
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Immediate dies for in-office indirect resin restorations.
    Beggs RJ.
    Dent Today; 2000 Sep; 19(9):144-9. PubMed ID: 12524736
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC, Grosko ML, Raj M, Ryan TN, Johnston WM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Sep; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
    Cura C, Isik FG, Dundar M.
    Gen Dent; 2011 Sep; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.