These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 12527456

  • 1. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
    Chang YK, Chen WH, Yu MH, Liu HS.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Rahall A, Jones MM, Goodwin TM, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation.
    Jha N, Sagili H, Jayalakshmi D, Lakshminarayanan S.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
    Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Pokpirom J.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Oral misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term.
    Nagpal MB, Raghunandan C, Saili A.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 106(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 19375704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
    Sifakis S, Angelakis E, Avgoustinakis E, Fragouli Y, Mantas N, Koukoura O, Vardaki E, Koumantakis E.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Apr; 275(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 17028904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Medical indications of labor induction: a comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and intravenous prostaglandin E2].
    Jouatte F, Subtil D, Marquis P, Plennevaux JL, Puech F.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Dec; 29(8):763-771. PubMed ID: 11139713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.