These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

405 related items for PubMed ID: 12542617

  • 1. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S, Mejàre I.
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
    Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly KJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, García-Godoy F, De Araujo FB.
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results.
    dos Santos MP, Passos M, Luiz RR, Maia LC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):156-66; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 19188412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M, Mulki E, Roldan R, Arevalo O, Roberts JF, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016 Feb; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
    Atieh M.
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP, Luiz RR, Maia LC.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.
    Gaintantzopoulou MD, Gopinath VK, Zinelis S.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 27165307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dias AGA, Magno MB, Delbem ACB, Cunha RF, Maia LC, Pessan JP.
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation.
    Andersson-Wenckert I, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD, Swift EJ, May KN, Thompson JY, McDougal RA.
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
    Croll TP, Helpin ML, Donly KJ.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000 Jul; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Lack of effect of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer restorations on the contacting surface of adjacent primary molars. a clinical prospective study.
    Kotsanos N, Dionysopoulos P.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15471520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V, Harneker SY, Patel N, Siegfried N.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr 15; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May 15; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D, Messer H.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov 15; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
    Ersin NK, Candan U, Aykut A, Onçağ O, Eronat C, Kose T.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov 15; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C, Rêgo HM, Perote LC, Santos LF, Kamozaki MB, Gutierrez NC, Di Nicoló R, Borges AB.
    J Dent; 2014 Jul 15; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.