These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

125 related items for PubMed ID: 12544227

  • 1. Hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: I. Experimental results from a new quick-setting material.
    Eppley BL.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 12544227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The use of hydroxyapatite and autogenous cancellous bone grafts to repair bone defects in rats.
    Silva RV, Camilli JA, Bertran CA, Moreira NH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 15695048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Repair of craniofacial defects with hydroxyapatite cement.
    Lew D, Farrell B, Bardach J, Keller J.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Dec; 55(12):1441-9; discussion 1449-51. PubMed ID: 9393404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Early effect of platelet-rich plasma on bone healing in combination with an osteoconductive material in rat cranial defects.
    Plachokova AS, van den Dolder J, Stoelinga PJ, Jansen JA.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 17348890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Hydroxyapatite granule/carrier composites promote new bone formation in cortical defects.
    Liljensten EL, Attaelmanan AG, Larsson C, Ljusberg-Wahren H, Danielsen N, Hirsch JM, Thomsen P.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000 Apr; 2(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 11359275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Resorbable and nonresorbable hydroxyapatite granules as bone graft substitutes in rabbit cortical defects.
    Liljensten E, Adolfsson E, Strid KG, Thomsen P.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2003 Apr; 5(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 14536044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: 2. Clinical experience with a new quick-setting material.
    Eppley BL, Hollier L, Stal S.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 14(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 12621292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preliminary report: a ceramic containing crosslinked collagen as a new cranial onlay and inlay material.
    Schendel S, Bresnick S, Cholon A.
    Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Feb; 38(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 9043585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A new approach to enhancement of bone formation by electrically polarized hydroxyapatite.
    Teng NC, Nakamura S, Takagi Y, Yamashita Y, Ohgaki M, Yamashita K.
    J Dent Res; 2001 Oct; 80(10):1925-9. PubMed ID: 11706953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Three-dimensional printing of bone repair and replacement materials: impact on craniofacial surgery.
    Ricci JL, Clark EA, Murriky A, Smay JE.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):304-8. PubMed ID: 22337431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Bone formation following implantation of titanium sponge rods into humeral osteotomies in dogs: a histological and histometrical study.
    Faria PE, Carvalho AL, Felipucci DN, Wen C, Sennerby L, Salata LA.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 19076179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the long-term results of rat cranial bone repair using a particular xenograft.
    Develioglu H, Saraydin S, Kartal U, Taner L.
    J Oral Implantol; 2010 Mar; 36(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 20553170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. BoneSource for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.
    Turk JB, Parhiscar A.
    Facial Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 16(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 11802350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hydroxyapatite crystallinity does not affect the repair of critical size bone defects.
    Conz MB, Granjeiro JM, Soares Gde A.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 19(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 21655775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of a biphasic ceramic on calvarial bone regeneration in rats.
    Develioğlu H, Koptagel E, Gedik R, Dupoirieux L.
    J Oral Implantol; 2005 Aug; 31(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 16447905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The efficacy of custom-made porous hydroxyapatite prostheses for cranioplasty: evaluation of postmarketing data on 2697 patients.
    Stefini R, Zanotti B, Nataloni A, Martinetti R, Scafuto M, Colasurdo M, Tampieri A.
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2015 Jul 04; 13(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 25589160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Bony healing of large cranial and mandibular defects protected from soft-tissue interposition: A comparative study of spontaneous bone regeneration, osteoconduction, and cancellous autografting in dogs.
    Lemperle SM, Calhoun CJ, Curran RW, Holmes RE.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Mar 04; 101(3):660-72. PubMed ID: 9500382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assessment of the effects on growth of porous hydroxyapatite granule cranioplasty in the immature guinea pig craniofacial skeleton.
    Hobar PC, Hunt JA, Antrobus S.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Apr 15; 111(5):1667-75; discussion 1676-9. PubMed ID: 12655213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Lack of repair of rat skull critical size defect treated with bovine morphometric protein bound to microgranular bioabsorbable hydroxyapatite.
    Ferreira GR, Cestari TM, Granjeiro JM, Taga R.
    Braz Dent J; 2004 Apr 15; 15(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 15798818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cranioplasty performed with a new osteoconductive osteoinducing hydroxyapatite-derived material.
    Pompili A, Caroli F, Carpanese L, Caterino M, Raus L, Sestili G, Occhipinti E.
    J Neurosurg; 1998 Aug 15; 89(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 9688118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.