These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

97 related items for PubMed ID: 12544807

  • 21. Phacoemulsification tip vacuum pressure: Comparison of 4 devices.
    Payne M, Georgescu D, Waite AN, Olson RJ.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1374-7. PubMed ID: 16863978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of ultrasonic energy expenditures and corneal endothelial cell density reductions during modulated and non-modulated phacoemulsification.
    Davison JA.
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2007 Aug; 38(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 17552387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Torsional power study using CENTURION phacoemulsification technology.
    Jensen JD, Shi DS, Robinson MS, Kramer GD, Zaugg B, Stagg BC, Pettey JH, Barlow WR, Olson RJ.
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 44(8):710-713. PubMed ID: 26999336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Long-term follow-up of posterior capsule opacification after AquaLase and NeoSoniX phacoemulsification.
    Stepanov A, Nekolova J, Jiraskova N, Rozsival P.
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2016 Mar; 160(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 26365930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Phacodynamics: an aspiration flow vs vacuum comparison.
    Adams W, Brinton J, Floyd M, Olson RJ.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):320-2. PubMed ID: 16876517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Corneal endothelial morphology and function after torsional and longitudinal ultrasound mode phacoemulsification.
    Módis LJ, Szalai E, Flaskó Z, Németh G.
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 60(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 29450332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. New phacoemulsification technologies.
    Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jun; 28(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 12036654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Power modulations in new phacoemulsification technology: improved outcomes.
    Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):1014-9. PubMed ID: 15130637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Thermal study of longitudinal and torsional ultrasound phacoemulsification: tracking the temperature of the corneal surface, incision, and handpiece.
    Jun B, Berdahl JP, Kim T.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):832-7. PubMed ID: 20457377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparative clinical trial of ultrasound phacoemulsification with and without the WhiteStar system.
    Fishkind W, Bakewell B, Donnenfeld ED, Rose AD, Watkins LA, Olson RJ.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 16516777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comparison of BD Multivisc with the soft shell technique in cases with hard lens nucleus and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.
    Fasce F, Spinelli A, Bolognesi G, Rossi M, Gemma M.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 17(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 17932844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Fluid dynamics and intraocular pressure using venturi phacoemulsification machine in dogs ex vivo.
    Kang S, Park S, Noh H, Seo K.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 18(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 25348150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Removal of posterior segment retained lens material using the OZil phacoemulsification handpiece versus Fragmatome during pars plana vitrectomy.
    Chiang A, Garg SJ, Alshareef RA, Pitcher JD, Hu AY, Spirn MJ, Hsu J, Lane RG, Regillo CD, Ho AC, Schwartz SD.
    Retina; 2012 Jul; 32(10):2119-26. PubMed ID: 22718151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Thermal characterization of phacoemulsification probes operated in axial and torsional modes.
    Zacharias J.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jan; 41(1):208-16. PubMed ID: 25532644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Cumulative tip travel and implied followability of longitudinal and torsional phacoemulsification.
    Davison JA.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):986-90. PubMed ID: 18499006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Phacoemulsification. Technology and fundamentals.
    Gilger BC.
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 1997 Sep; 27(5):1131-41. PubMed ID: 9326970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Performance comparison of the Alcon Legacy 20000 straight and flared 0.9 mm Aspiration Bypass System tips.
    Davison JA.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jan; 28(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 11777713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Laboratory analysis of phacoemulsifier compliance and capacity.
    Nejad M, Injev VP, Miller KM.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):2019-28. PubMed ID: 23079316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparison of Vacuum and Aspiration on Phacoemulsification Efficiency and Chatter Using a Monitored Forced Infusion System.
    Shi DS, Jensen JD, Kramer GD, Zaugg B, Stagg BC, Pettey JH, Barlow WR, Olson RJ.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 169():162-167. PubMed ID: 27349412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Performance comparison of the Alcon Legacy 20000 1.1 mm TurboSonics and 0.9 mm Aspiration Bypass System tips.
    Davison JA.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Oct; 25(10):1386-91. PubMed ID: 10511940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.