These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

442 related items for PubMed ID: 1256212

  • 21. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H, Cozma S, Boutitie F, Disant F, Truy E, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Promontory electrical stimulation in postoperative acoustic tumor patients.
    Lambert PR, Ruth RA, Thomas JF.
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jul; 102(7):814-9. PubMed ID: 1614252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [History of the development and functional description of the Nucleus cochlear implant].
    Maltan AA.
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1994 Jul; 144(1-2):29-33. PubMed ID: 8197760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
    Papsin BC.
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.
    Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Guida M, Di Trapani G, Sanna M.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Oct; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M, Haenggeli A, Zhang J, Pelizzone M, Häusler R, Rouiller EM.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study.
    van Weert S, Stokroos RJ, Rikers MM, van Dijk P.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):725-31. PubMed ID: 16012034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Cochlear nucleus auditory prostheses.
    McCreery DB.
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):64-73. PubMed ID: 18207678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. UCH/RNID single channel extracochlear implant: results in thirty profoundly deafened adults.
    Cooper HR, Carpenter L, Aleksy W, Booth CL, Read TE, Graham JM, Fraser JG.
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989 Aug; 18():22-38. PubMed ID: 2607192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Otosclerosis: selection of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Matterson AG, O'Leary S, Pinder D, Freidman L, Dowell R, Briggs R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):438-46. PubMed ID: 17468676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Artificial vision: needs, functioning, and testing of a retinal electronic prosthesis.
    Chader GJ, Weiland J, Humayun MS.
    Prog Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 175():317-32. PubMed ID: 19660665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
    Hoth S, Lenarz T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [The Nucleus Double Array Cochlear Implant: a new concept in obliterated cochlea].
    Lenarz T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Weber BP, Frohne C, Büchner A, Battmer RD, Parker J, von Wallenberg E.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Aug; 78(8):421-8. PubMed ID: 10488461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Clinical observations in electric stimulation of the ear (author's transl)].
    Burian K.
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 223(1):139-66. PubMed ID: 383059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Protocol for determining the auditory percepts of electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    Michelson RP, Schubert E, Walsh S, White M.
    Laryngoscope; 1979 May; 89(5 Pt 1):748-51. PubMed ID: 449518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Brain stem responses evoked by stimulation with an auditory brain stem implant in children with cochlear nerve aplasia or hypoplasia.
    O'Driscoll M, El-Deredy W, Atas A, Sennaroglu G, Sennaroglu L, Ramsden RT.
    Ear Hear; 2011 May; 32(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 21150625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.
    Kumar G, Chokshi M, Richter CP.
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19857561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.