These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

203 related items for PubMed ID: 12581034

  • 1. Satisfaction with team midwifery care for low- and high-risk women: a randomized controlled trial.
    Biró MA, Waldenström U, Brown S, Pannifex JH.
    Birth; 2003 Mar; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12581034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial.
    Biró MA, Waldenström U, Pannifex JH.
    Birth; 2000 Sep; 27(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 11251497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Continuity of care in maternity services: women's views of one team midwifery scheme.
    Farquhar M, Camilleri-Ferrante C, Todd C.
    Midwifery; 2000 Mar; 16(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 11139860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK.
    Fernandez Turienzo C, Bick D, Briley AL, Bollard M, Coxon K, Cross P, Silverio SA, Singh C, Seed PT, Tribe RM, Shennan AH, Sandall J, POPPIE Pilot Collaborative Group.
    PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003350. PubMed ID: 33022010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Experiences of maternity care among women at increased risk of preterm birth receiving midwifery continuity of care compared to women receiving standard care: Results from the POPPIE pilot trial.
    Fernandez Turienzo C, Silverio SA, Coxon K, Brigante L, Seed PT, Shennan AH, Sandall J, POPPIE Collaborative Group.
    PLoS One; 2021 Oct; 16(4):e0248588. PubMed ID: 33882059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Continuity of care by a midwife team versus routine care during pregnancy and birth: a randomised trial.
    Rowley MJ, Hensley MJ, Brinsmead MW, Wlodarczyk JH.
    Med J Aust; 1995 Sep 18; 163(6):289-93. PubMed ID: 7565233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Quality of midwifery led care: assessing the effects of different models of continuity for women's satisfaction.
    Morgan M, Fenwick N, McKenzie C, Wolfe CD.
    Qual Health Care; 1998 Jun 18; 7(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 10180794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The impact of caseload midwifery, compared with standard care, on women's perceptions of antenatal care quality: Survey results from the M@NGO randomized controlled trial for women of any risk.
    Allen J, Kildea S, Tracy MB, Hartz DL, Welsh AW, Tracy SK.
    Birth; 2019 Sep 18; 46(3):439-449. PubMed ID: 31231863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction.
    Floris L, Irion O, Bonnet J, Politis Mercier MP, de Labrusse C.
    Women Birth; 2018 Apr 18; 31(2):124-133. PubMed ID: 28711398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
    McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, Farrell T, Gold L, Biro MA, Albers L, Flood M, Oats J, Waldenström U.
    BJOG; 2012 Nov 18; 119(12):1483-92. PubMed ID: 22830446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Western Australian women's perceptions of the style and quality of midwifery postnatal care in hospital and at home.
    Fenwick J, Butt J, Dhaliwal S, Hauck Y, Schmied V.
    Women Birth; 2010 Mar 18; 23(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 19632912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: a randomised controlled trial.
    McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, Lumley J, Farrell T, Oats J, Gold L, Waldenström U, Albers L, Biro MA.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2008 Aug 05; 8():35. PubMed ID: 18680606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Continuity of carer and satisfaction.
    Waldenström U.
    Midwifery; 1998 Dec 05; 14(4):207-13. PubMed ID: 10076315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Are women's expectations and preferences for intrapartum care affected by the model of care on offer?
    Hundley V, Ryan M.
    BJOG; 2004 Jun 05; 111(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 15198782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Midwife-led continuity of care increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care: North Shoa, Amhara regional state, Ethiopia: A quasi-experimental study.
    Hailemeskel S, Alemu K, Christensson K, Tesfahun E, Lindgren H.
    Women Birth; 2022 Nov 05; 35(6):553-562. PubMed ID: 35067458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Women's expectations on antenatal care as assessed in early pregnancy: number of visits, continuity of caregiver and general content.
    Hildingsson I, Waldenström U, Rådestad I.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Feb 05; 81(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 11942901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Team midwifery: the views and job satisfaction of midwives.
    Todd CJ, Farquhar MC, Camilleri-Ferrante C.
    Midwifery; 1998 Dec 05; 14(4):214-24. PubMed ID: 10076316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.