These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

281 related items for PubMed ID: 12584636

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C, Prost P, Michiels C, Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP, Phelip JM, Martin L, Rassiat E, Faivre J.
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reprocessing practice in digestive endoscopy units of district hospitals: results of a Portuguese National Survey.
    Soares JB, Gonçalves R, Banhudo A, Pedrosa J.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Nov; 23(11):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21862930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biopsy forceps: disposable or reusable?
    Muscarella LF.
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001 Nov; 24(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11847729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Manual methods are suboptimal compared with automated methods for cleaning of single-use biopsy forceps.
    Alfa MJ, Nemes R, Olson N, Mulaire A.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 27(8):841-6. PubMed ID: 16874645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Inconsistencies in endoscope-reprocessing and infection-control guidelines: the importance of endoscope drying.
    Muscarella LF.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 101(9):2147-54. PubMed ID: 16968511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of sterilization of reusable endoscopic biopsy forceps by autoclaving and ethylene oxide gas.
    Yoon JH, Yoon BC, Lee HL, Lee JK, Kim YT, Lee DH, Choi IJ, Lee DH, Kim DH.
    Dig Dis Sci; 2012 Feb; 57(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 21904859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Decontaminated single-use devices: an oxymoron that may be placing patients at risk for cross-contamination.
    Heeg P, Roth K, Reichl R, Cogdill CP, Bond WW.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):542-9. PubMed ID: 11732782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.
    Deprez PH, Horsmans Y, Van Hassel M, Hoang P, Piessevaux H, Geubel A.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 10699768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [HYGEA (Hygiene in gastroenterology--endoscope reprocessing): Study on quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes in hospitals and in the practice setting].
    Bader L, Blumenstock G, Birkner B, Leiss O, Heesemann J, Riemann JF, Selbmann HK.
    Z Gastroenterol; 2002 Mar; 40(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 11901449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reprocessing endoscopes: United States perspective.
    Rutala WA, Weber DJ.
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Apr; 56 Suppl 2():S27-39. PubMed ID: 15110120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In vitro study and in vivo application of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
    Kozarek RA, Raltz SL, Brandabur JJ, Patterson DJ, Ball TJ, Gluck MG, Sumida SE, Roach SK, Drajpuch DE, Irizarry DL.
    Endoscopy; 2001 May; 33(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 11396756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.