These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

160 related items for PubMed ID: 12588506

  • 1. The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.
    Abdullah MA, Talic YF.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12588506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep 01; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA, Vermilyea SG, Agar JR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec 01; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
    Bindra B, Heath JR.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan 01; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA, Pereira BP.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992 Jan 01; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY, Jameson LM, Moser JB, Hesby RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep 01; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials.
    Sulong MZ, Setchell DJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec 01; 66(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 1805022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
    Peregrina A, Land MF, Wandling C, Johnston WM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep 01; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of reactive adhesives on the tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to methyl methacrylate tray material.
    Ona M, Takahashi H, Sato M, Igarashi Y, Wakabayashi N.
    Dent Mater J; 2010 May 01; 29(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 20484844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Smith GM, Taylor WG.
    J Dent; 1992 Jun 01; 20(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 1624625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun 01; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.