These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

160 related items for PubMed ID: 12588506

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
    Payne JA, Pereira BP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
    Millstein P, Maya A, Segura C.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques.
    Chee WW, Donovan TE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):728-32. PubMed ID: 1432791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The bond strength of different tray adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane to two tray materials: an in vitro study.
    Ashwini BL, Manjunath S, Mathew KX.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Mar; 14(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 24604995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Tensile bond strength between custom tray and elastomeric impression material.
    Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Oka M, Minagi S, Irie M, Suzuki K.
    Dent Mater J; 2007 May; 26(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 17694739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Universal Tray Adhesives on Silicone Impression Materials Using an Acrylic Tray.
    Kambiranda SC, Pinto B, Elpatal MA, Sam G, Chaitra AS, Rani RP.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Dec 01; 20(12):1406-1411. PubMed ID: 32381841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
    Rutkunas V, Ignatovic J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar 01; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effect of fabrication process on the bond strength between silicone elastomer and acrylic resin for maxillofacial prosthesis.
    Hattori M, Sumita YI, Muthiah L, Iwasaki N, Takahashi H, Aimaijiang Y, Yoshi S, Taniguchi H.
    Dent Mater J; 2014 Mar 01; 33(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 24492106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. In vitro tensile bond strength of denture repair acrylic resins to primed base metal alloys using two different processing techniques.
    Banerjee S, Engelmeier RL, O'Keefe KL, Powers JM.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec 01; 18(8):676-83. PubMed ID: 19682213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A, Soderholm KJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011 Dec 01; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.