These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
241 related items for PubMed ID: 12592272
1. Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents. Ramsey PS, Harris DY, Ogburn PL, Heise RH, Magtibay PM, Ramin KD. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 188(2):560-5. PubMed ID: 12592272 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative cost analysis of prostaglandin analogues dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents. Ramsey PS, Harris DY, Ogburn PL, Heise RH, Magtibay PM, Ramin KD. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns; 1998 Jul 01; 5(4):182. PubMed ID: 10838340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Chang CH, Chang FM. J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May 01; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA, Rahall A, Jones MM, Goodwin TM, Paul RH. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun 01; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep 01; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk? Kolderup L, McLean L, Grullon K, Safford K, Kilpatrick SJ. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun 01; 180(6 Pt 1):1543-50. PubMed ID: 10368502 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial. Sanchez-Ramos L, Peterson DE, Delke I, Gaudier FL, Kaunitz AM. Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar 01; 91(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 9491868 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing two dinoprostone agents for preinduction cervical ripening at term. A randomized trial. Wieland D, Friedman F. J Reprod Med; 1999 Aug 01; 44(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 10483544 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix. Bolnick JM, Velazquez MD, Gonzalez JL, Rappaport VJ, McIlwain-Dunivan G, Rayburn WF. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan 01; 190(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 14749647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Khoury AN, Zhou QP, Gorenberg DM, Nies BM, Manley GE, Mecklenburg FE. J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun 01; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Nunes F, Rodrigues R, Meirinho M. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep 01; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Neiger R, Greaves PC. Tenn Med; 2001 Jan 01; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. Danielian P, Porter B, Ferri N, Summers J, Templeton A. Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug 01; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction. Ramsey PS, Ogburn PL, Harris DY, Heise RH, Ramin KD. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct 01; 187(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 12388961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Preinduction cervical ripening with commercially available prostaglandin E2 gel: a randomized, double-blind comparison with a hospital-compounded preparation. Sanchez-Ramos L, Farah LA, Kaunitz AM, Adair CD, Del Valle GO, Fuqua P. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct 01; 173(4):1079-84. PubMed ID: 7485297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D. Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar 01; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA, Jones MM, Rahall A, Goodwin TM, Paul RH. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun 01; 172(6):1804-10. PubMed ID: 7778636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction. Chang YK, Chen WH, Yu MH, Liu HS. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan 01; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Gaudineau A, Senat MV, Ehlinger V, Gallini A, Morin M, Olivier P, Roth E, Orusco E, Javoise S, Fort J, Lavergne C, Arnaud C, Rozenberg P, Vayssiere C, Groupe de Recherche en Obstétrique rt Gynécologie. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov 01; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]