These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev; 2016 Feb 09; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Wieland LS, Coles B, Weightman AL. Syst Rev; 2013 Sep 25; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protocol: a systematic review of studies developing and/or evaluating search strategies to identify prognosis studies. Corp N, Jordan JL, Hayden JA, Irvin E, Parker R, Smith A, van der Windt DA. Syst Rev; 2017 Apr 20; 6(1):88. PubMed ID: 28427475 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. Syst Rev; 2018 Nov 20; 7(1):200. PubMed ID: 30458825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies. Whiting P, Westwood M, Burke M, Sterne J, Glanville J. J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr 20; 61(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 18313560 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian. Li L, Tian J, Tian H, Moher D, Liang F, Jiang T, Yao L, Yang K. J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep 20; 67(9):1001-7. PubMed ID: 24841794 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Are men difficult to find? Identifying male-specific studies in MEDLINE and Embase. Stewart F, Fraser C, Robertson C, Avenell A, Archibald D, Douglas F, Hoddinott P, van Teijlingen E, Boyers D. Syst Rev; 2014 Jul 18; 3():78. PubMed ID: 25033713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Expediting citation screening using PICo-based title-only screening for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews. Rathbone J, Albarqouni L, Bakhit M, Beller E, Byambasuren O, Hoffmann T, Scott AM, Glasziou P. Syst Rev; 2017 Nov 25; 6(1):233. PubMed ID: 29178925 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality. Betrán AP, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Allen T, Hampson L. BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jan 28; 5(1):6. PubMed ID: 15679886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Lessons for search strategies from a systematic review, in The Cochrane Library, of nutritional supplementation trials in patients after hip fracture. Avenell A, Handoll HH, Grant AM. Am J Clin Nutr; 2001 Mar 28; 73(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 11237924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]