These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
29 related items for PubMed ID: 12596825
1. [Judgment of the efficacy of digital image diagnosis and ROC analysis]. Shiraishi J. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jan; 58(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 12596825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization]. Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Reissberg S, Scherlach C, Döhring W. Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [A ROC analysis for comparing contrast perception in grey scale reversal of digital images]. Dölken W, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Horwitz AE, Lackner K. Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2018803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom. Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Börjesson J, Mattsson S, Schlossman D. Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure. Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Schlossman D, Börjesson J, Håkansson E, Mattsson S, Tylén U. Acta Radiol; 1989 Nov; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality assessment tools for radiation dose optimization in digital radiography: an overview. Seeram E, Davidson R, Bushong S, Swan H. Radiol Technol; 2014 Nov; 85(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 24806056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography]. Müller RD, Hirche H, Voss M, Buddenbrock B, John V, Gocke P. Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Grassl U, Schulze RK. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. Cole EB, Pisano ED, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Brown ME, Feig SA, Jong RA, Maidment AD, Staiger MJ, Kuzmiak CM, Freimanis RI, Lesko N, Rosen EL, Walsh R, Williford M, Braeuning MP. Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 12511684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Judgment of the efficacy of digital image diagnosis and ROC analysis]. Shiraishi J. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jan; 58(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 12596825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization]. Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Reissberg S, Scherlach C, Döhring W. Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [A ROC analysis for comparing contrast perception in grey scale reversal of digital images]. Dölken W, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Horwitz AE, Lackner K. Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2018803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]