These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


193 related items for PubMed ID: 12597933

  • 1. Management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: 12-year, single-center experience.
    Ng CS, Yost AJ, Streem SB.
    Urology; 2003 Feb; 61(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 12597933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty.
    Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, Dave S, Bagli DJ, Khoury AE, Pippi Salle JL, Farhat WA.
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP, Grubb RL, Rehman J, Yan Y, Chen C, Landman J, McDougall EM, Clayman RV.
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
    Shapiro EY, Cho JS, Srinivasan A, Seideman CA, Huckabay CP, Andonian S, Lee BR, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR.
    Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
    Asensio M, Gander R, Royo GF, Lloret J.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparative study of hot-wire balloon and ureteroscopic laser.
    Ponsky LE, Streem SB.
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):823-6. PubMed ID: 17094762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Varkarakis IM, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Inagaki T, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW.
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):180-2. PubMed ID: 15201766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of percutaneous endopyelotomy with open pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Schenkman EM, Tarry WF.
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):1013-5. PubMed ID: 9474220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
    Umari P, Lissiani A, Trombetta C, Belgrano E.
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficacy of endopyelotomy in patients with secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Patel T, Kellner CP, Katsumi H, Gupta M.
    J Endourol; 2011 Apr; 25(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 21388243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.