These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

248 related items for PubMed ID: 12598105

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Identifiability of diffusion and sorption parameters from in situ diffusion experiments by using simultaneously tracer dilution and claystone data.
    Naves A, Samper J, Gimmi T.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Nov; 142-143():63-74. PubMed ID: 23142728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Anisotropic diffusion in layered argillaceous rocks: a case study with Opalinus Clay.
    Van Loon LR, Soler JM, Müller W, Bradbury MH.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Nov 01; 38(21):5721-8. PubMed ID: 15575292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Interpretation of injection-withdrawal tracer experiments conducted between two wells in a large single fracture.
    Novakowski KS, Bickerton G, Lapcevic P.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep 01; 73(1-4):227-47. PubMed ID: 15336796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An analytical model for the interpretation of pulse injection experiments performed for testing the spatial variability of clay formations.
    Aertsens M, Put M, Dierckx A.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Mar 01; 61(1-4):423-36. PubMed ID: 12598121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. In situ diffusion experiment in granite: phase I.
    Vilks P, Cramer JJ, Jensen M, Miller NH, Miller HG, Stanchell FW.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Mar 01; 61(1-4):191-202. PubMed ID: 12598104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Improved interpretation of in-diffusion measurements with confined swelling clays.
    Yaroshchuk AE, Van Loon LR.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Apr 04; 97(1-2):67-74. PubMed ID: 18291558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Obtaining the porewater composition of a clay rock by modeling the in- and out-diffusion of anions and cations from an in-situ experiment.
    Appelo CA, Vinsot A, Mettler S, Wechner S.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Oct 23; 101(1-4):67-76. PubMed ID: 18805602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative modeling of an in situ diffusion experiment in granite at the Grimsel Test Site.
    Soler JM, Landa J, Havlova V, Tachi Y, Ebina T, Sardini P, Siitari-Kauppi M, Eikenberg J, Martin AJ.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Aug 23; 179():89-101. PubMed ID: 26074058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Solute transport in crystalline rocks at Aspö--II: blind predictions, inverse modelling and lessons learnt from test STT1.
    Jakob A, Mazurek M, Heer W.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Mar 23; 61(1-4):175-90. PubMed ID: 12598103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.