These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Delgado MF, Nguyen NT, Cox TA, Singh K, Lee DA, Dueker DK, Fechtner RD, Juzych MS, Lin SC, Netland PA, Pastor SA, Schuman JS, Samples JR, American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee 2001-2002 Glaucoma Panel. Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Normal intersubject threshold variability and normal limits of the SITA SWAP and full threshold SWAP perimetric programs. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):5029-34. PubMed ID: 14578431 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields. Capris P, Autuori S, Capris E, Papadia M. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Jun; 76(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 9686835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Wild JM, Pacey IE, O'Neill EC, Cunliffe IA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality. Tafreshi A, Sample PA, Liebmann JM, Girkin CA, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Lalezary M, Racette L. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc. Sakata LM, Deleon-Ortega J, Arthur SN, Monheit BE, Girkin CA. Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster. Tan JCK, Agar A, Kalloniatis M, Phu J. Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Isolation of short-wavelength sensitive mechanisms in normal and glaucomatous visual field regions. Demirel S, Johnson CA. J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 10708234 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]