These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

195 related items for PubMed ID: 12605273

  • 1. PET imaging with yttrium-86: comparison of phantom measurements acquired with different PET scanners before and after applying background subtraction.
    Buchholz HG, Herzog H, Förster GJ, Reber H, Nickel O, Rösch F, Bartenstein P.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 May; 30(5):716-20. PubMed ID: 12605273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. PET imaging problems with the non-standard positron emitters Yttrium-86 and Iodine-124.
    Herzog H, Tellmann L, Scholten B, Coenen HH, Qaim SM.
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Jun; 52(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 18043538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Performance of list mode data acquisition with ECAT EXACT HR and ECAT EXACT HR+ positron emission scanners.
    Watabe H, Matsumoto K, Senda M, Iida H.
    Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Apr; 20(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 16715949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Optimization of PET image quality by means of 3D data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction].
    Doll J, Zaers J, Trojan H, Bellemann ME, Adam LE, Haberkorn U, Brix G.
    Nuklearmedizin; 1998 Mar; 37(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 9547752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
    Carlier T, Willowson KP, Fourkal E, Bailey DL, Doss M, Conti M.
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The design and implementation of a motion correction scheme for neurological PET.
    Bloomfield PM, Spinks TJ, Reed J, Schnorr L, Westrip AM, Livieratos L, Fulton R, Jones T.
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Apr 21; 48(8):959-78. PubMed ID: 12741495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quantitative imaging of yttrium-86 PET with the ECAT EXACT HR+ in 2D mode.
    Kull T, Ruckgaber J, Weller R, Reske S, Glatting G.
    Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2004 Aug 21; 19(4):482-90. PubMed ID: 15453963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of the short-lived non-pure positron-emitting nuclide (120)I for PET imaging.
    Herzog H, Qaim SM, Tellmann L, Spellerberg S, Kruecker D, Coenen HH.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Nov 21; 33(11):1249-57. PubMed ID: 16845512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Correction for oral contrast artifacts in CT attenuation-corrected PET images obtained by combined PET/CT.
    Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Kalaigian H, Kolbert KS, Pan T, Yeung H, Squire O, Sinha A, Larson SM, Humm JL.
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Dec 21; 44(12):1940-4. PubMed ID: 14660720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A hybrid scatter correction for 3D PET based on an estimation of the distribution of unscattered coincidences: implementation on the ECAT EXACT HR+.
    Ferreira NC, Trébossen R, Lartizien C, Brulon V, Merceron P, Bendriem B.
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 May 07; 47(9):1555-71. PubMed ID: 12043820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols.
    Lartizien C, Kinahan PE, Comtat C.
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr 07; 45(4):714-23. PubMed ID: 15073270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Quantitative imaging of bromine-76 and yttrium-86 with PET: a method for the removal of spurious activity introduced by cascade gamma rays.
    Beattie BJ, Finn RD, Rowland DJ, Pentlow KS.
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep 07; 30(9):2410-23. PubMed ID: 14528963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET.
    Visvikis D, Costa DC, Croasdale I, Lonn AH, Bomanji J, Gacinovic S, Ell PJ.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Mar 07; 30(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 12634961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Three-dimensional positron emission tomography imaging with 124I and 86Y.
    Vandenberghe S.
    Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Mar 07; 27(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 16479243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of fluorine-18 and bromine-76 imaging in positron emission tomography.
    Ribeiro MJ, Almeida P, Strul D, Ferreira N, Loc'h C, Brulon V, Trébossen R, Mazière B, Bendriem B.
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Jul 07; 26(7):758-66. PubMed ID: 10398824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative90 Y PET.
    Strydhorst J, Carlier T, Dieudonné A, Conti M, Buvat I.
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct 07; 43(10):5320-5329. PubMed ID: 28105711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Evaluation of noise equivalent count per line of response: new parameter for count statistics for PET systems].
    Matsumoto K, Wada Y, Matsuura H, Senda M.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Aug 07; 60(8):1116-22. PubMed ID: 15389169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An analytical scatter correction for singles-mode transmission data in PET.
    Vandervoort E, Sossi V.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Mar 07; 27(3):402-12. PubMed ID: 18334435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies.
    Votaw JR, White M.
    J Nucl Med; 2001 May 07; 42(5):701-6. PubMed ID: 11337563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.
    Bettinardi V, Mancosu P, Danna M, Giovacchini G, Landoni C, Picchio M, Gilardi MC, Savi A, Castiglioni I, Lecchi M, Fazio F.
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep 07; 51(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 17464266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.