These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

507 related items for PubMed ID: 12607843

  • 1. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W, Ji WG, Debrie A, Rowlands JA.
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
    Hunt DC, Tousignant O, Rowlands JA.
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
    Zhao W, Rowlands JA.
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Measured and calculated K-fluorescence effects on the MTF of an amorphous-selenium based CCD x-ray detector.
    Hunter DM, Belev G, Kasap S, Yaffe MJ.
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):608-22. PubMed ID: 22320770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Amorphous selenium flat panel detectors for digital mammography: validation of a NPWE model observer with CDMAM observer performance experiments.
    Segui JA, Zhao W.
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3711-22. PubMed ID: 17089837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH, Zhao W.
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ, Samei E.
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: construction and evaluation of a prototype real-time detector.
    Zhao W, Blevis I, Germann S, Rowlands JA, Waechter D, Huang Z.
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1834-43. PubMed ID: 9434966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
    El-Mohri Y, Antonuk LE, Zhao Q, Wang Y, Li Y, Du H, Sawant A.
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
    Williams MB, Simoni PU, Smilowitz L, Stanton M, Phillips W, Stewart A.
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao B, Zhou J, Hu YH, Mertelmeier T, Ludwig J, Zhao W.
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 19235392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep 21; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A, Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, Li Y, Su Z, Wang Y, Yamamoto J, Zhao Q, Du H, Daniel J, Street R.
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb 21; 32(2):553-65. PubMed ID: 15789602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao B, Zhao W.
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec 21; 35(12):5219-32. PubMed ID: 19175081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW, Lemmens K, Bosmans H.
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb 21; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 21; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. System performance of a prototype flat-panel imager operated under mammographic conditions.
    Jee KW, Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, Zhao Q.
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul 21; 30(7):1874-90. PubMed ID: 12906206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.
    Acciavatti RJ, Maidment ADA.
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb 21; 46(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 30488455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
    Cremers F, Frenzel T, Kausch C, Albers D, Schönborn T, Schmidt R.
    Med Phys; 2004 May 21; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Digital x-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: reduction of aliasing.
    Ji WG, Zhao W, Rowlands JA.
    Med Phys; 1998 Nov 21; 25(11):2148-62. PubMed ID: 9829239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.