These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


333 related items for PubMed ID: 12611089

  • 61. Birth weight prediction from remote ultrasound examination.
    Spinnato JA, Allen RD, Mendenhall HW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jun; 71(6 Pt 1):893-8. PubMed ID: 3285269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62. Accuracy of ultrasound, clinical and maternal estimates of birth weight in term women.
    Ashrafganjooei T, Naderi T, Eshrati B, Babapoor N.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2010 Mar; 16(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 20795447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63. The clinical utility of fetal fibronectin in the prediction of pre-term birth in a low socio-economic setting hospital in Ecuador.
    Díaz J, Chedraui P, Hidalgo L, Medina M.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Feb; 22(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 19085632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64. Assessment of the accuracy of multiple sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas: a 10-year experience from a single center.
    Barel O, Vaknin Z, Tovbin J, Herman A, Maymon R.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 May; 32(5):815-23. PubMed ID: 23620324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65. [Ultrasonic measurement in the estimation of fetal weight].
    Situ X, Huang X.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1997 May; 32(5):299-301. PubMed ID: 9596857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66. Neonatal anthropometric measurements to predict birth weight by ultrasound.
    Stetzer BP, Thomas A, Amini SB, Catalano PM.
    J Perinatol; 2002 May; 22(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 12082476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67. Newborn weight charts underestimate the incidence of low birthweight in preterm infants.
    Burkhardt T, Schäffer L, Zimmermann R, Kurmanavicius J.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 199(2):139.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18395687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68. Maternal estimation of fetal weight as a complementary method of fetal weight assessment: a prospective clinical trial.
    Harlev A, Walfisch A, Bar-David J, Hershkovitz R, Friger M, Hallak M.
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Jul; 51(7):515-20. PubMed ID: 16913540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. Ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetuses: a comparison of 17 sonographic formulas and four models algorithms.
    Rosati P, Arduini M, Giri C, Guariglia L.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jul; 23(7):675-80. PubMed ID: 19895358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients.
    Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Kenney SP, Devoe LD.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 9464724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71. Accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight in 840 women with different pregnancy complications prior to induction of labor.
    Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Bar J, Mashiach R, Kaplan B, Hod M, Meizner I.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 23(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 14770399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72. Customizing fetal biometric charts.
    Pang MW, Leung TN, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Chang AM.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 22(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 12942500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73. Comparison of three sonographic circumference measurement techniques to predict birth weight.
    Smulian JC, Ranzini AC, Ananth CV, Rosenberg JC, Vintzileos AM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 93(5 Pt 1):692-6. PubMed ID: 10912969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74. [Estimation of fetal weight on the basis of neural network].
    Wu J, Yang T, Lin J, Luo H, Li D, Wang T, Zheng C.
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 22(5):922-5, 929. PubMed ID: 16294722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75. Ethnic differences in prenatal growth and the association with maternal and fetal characteristics.
    Drooger JC, Troe JW, Borsboom GJ, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Snijders RJ, Verhulst FC, Witteman JC, Steegers EA, Joung IM.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 26(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 16038011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76. Accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in multiple pregnancies.
    Lynch L, Lapinski R, Alvarez M, Lockwood CJ.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 6(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 8590207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77. Validity of sonographic prediction of fetal weight and weight discordance in twin pregnancies.
    Diaz-Garcia C, Bernard JP, Ville Y, Salomon LJ.
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Apr; 30(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 20187000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. Continuous independent quality control for fetal ultrasound biometry provided by the cumulative summation technique.
    Balsyte D, Schäffer L, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Zimmermann R, Kurmanavicius J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 20052663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79. Ultrasonographic assessment of growth and estimation of birthweight in late gestation fetal sheep.
    Carr DJ, Aitken RP, Milne JS, David AL, Wallace JM.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1588-95. PubMed ID: 21821347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. Intrapartum clinical, sonographic, and parous patients' estimates of newborn birth weight.
    Chauhan SP, Lutton PM, Bailey KJ, Guerrieri JP, Morrison JC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):956-8. PubMed ID: 1579321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.