These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
299 related items for PubMed ID: 12611403
1. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles? Sheinbach DM. Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach. Fleming NA. Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Deciding custody of frozen embryos: many eggs are frozen but who is chosen? Malo PE. DePaul J Health Care Law; 2002; 3():307-34. PubMed ID: 15929238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents. Waldman EA. Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce. King M. Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 2000; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution. Trespalacios MJ. Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sperm, egg, and a petri dish. Unveiling the underlying property issues surrounding cryopreserved embryos. Langley LS, Blackston JW. J Leg Med; 2006 Jun; 27(2):167-206. PubMed ID: 16728352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The "embryo" wars: at the epicenter of science, law, religion, and politics. Crockin SL. Fam Law Q; 2005 Jun; 39(3):599-632. PubMed ID: 16610149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo. Cuva AJ. N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991 Jun; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro fertilization and consent agreements: where does California stand? Ellis M. Santa Clara Law Rev; 2002 Jun; 42(4):1191-225. PubMed ID: 15212074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. From a to z: analysis of Massachusetts' approach to the enforceability of cryopreserved pre-embryo dispositional agreements. Kaplan S. Boston Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 81(5):1093-118. PubMed ID: 12715818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent". Pachman TS. Columbia J Gend Law; 2003 Dec; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no. Sieck WA. Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Seeking a better solution for the disposition of frozen embryos: is embryo adoption the answer? Redman PC, Redman LF. Tulsa Law J; 2000 Dec; 35(3-4):583-98. PubMed ID: 16273678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Parenthood, genes, and gametes: the family law and trusts and estates perspectives. Cahn NR. Univ Memphis Law Rev; 2002 Dec; 32(3):563-606. PubMed ID: 16526142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes. Muller RJ. Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993 May; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]