These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Object-position binding in visual short-term memory for sequentially presented unfamiliar stimuli. Sapkota RP, Pardhan S, van der Linde I. Perception; 2011 Feb; 40(5):538-48. PubMed ID: 21882718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Parellel and serial processing in tachistoscopic recognition: two mechanisms. Dick AO. J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 5083131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Loss of spatial and identity information following a tachistoscopic exposure. Townsend VM. J Exp Psychol; 1973 Apr; 98(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 4704202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Habituation and recovery of visual response in the alert human newborn. Friedman S. J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Apr; 13(2):339-49. PubMed ID: 5028283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of words and letters within words. Johnson NF, Marmurek HH. Am J Psychol; 1978 Sep; 91(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 742661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Form perception without attention. Rock I, Schauer R, Halper F. Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Aug; 28(3):429-40. PubMed ID: 1005651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Attention to multiple locations is limited by spatial working memory capacity. Close A, Sapir A, Burnett K, d'Avossa G. J Vis; 2014 Aug 21; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 25146575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Successive processing of color and form from brief visual displays. Gummerman K. Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Feb 21; 40(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 1118282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. Biederman I, Rabinowitz JC, Glass AL, Stacy EW. J Exp Psychol; 1974 Sep 21; 103(3):597-600. PubMed ID: 4448962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Blink and shrink: the effect of the attentional blink on spatial processing. Olivers CN, Olivers CN. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun 21; 30(3):613-31. PubMed ID: 15161390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The process of 'taking-into-account' in visual perception. Epstein W. Perception; 1973 Jun 21; 2(3):267-85. PubMed ID: 4794124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The processing of multidimensional information from iconic storage: perceptual independence and comparative rates of decay. Den Heyer K. Acta Psychol (Amst); 1972 Dec 21; 36(6):431-42. PubMed ID: 4679792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Manual tapping enhances visual short-term memory performance where visual and motor coordinates correspond. Sapkota RP, Pardhan S, van der Linde I. Br J Psychol; 2013 May 21; 104(2):249-64. PubMed ID: 23560670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual attention is available at a task-relevant location rapidly after a saccade. Yao T, Ketkar M, Treue S, Krishna BS. Elife; 2016 Nov 23; 5():. PubMed ID: 27879201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared. Kraft A, Pape N, Hagendorf H, Schmidt S, Naito A, Brandt SA. Brain Res; 2007 Feb 16; 1133(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 17174284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel precessing. Cohen G. J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar 16; 97(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 4705242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognition memory for sequentially presented pictorial and verbal spatial information. Murphy RJ. J Exp Psychol; 1973 Oct 16; 100(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 4745461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]