These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

298 related items for PubMed ID: 12637919

  • 1. Electrical impedance as a potential tool to distinguish between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
    Nyrén M, Kuzmina N, Emtestam L.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Mar; 48(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 12637919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Instrumental measurement of the Mantoux test: differential effects of tuberculin and sodium lauryl sulphate on impedance response patterns in human skin.
    Nyrén M, Hagströmer L, Emtestam L.
    Dermatology; 2000 Mar; 201(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 11096191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Correlation between laser Doppler perfusion imaging and visual scoring of patch test sites in subjects with experimentally induced allergic and irritant contact reactions.
    Goon AT, Leow YH, Chan YH, Goh CL.
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 Feb; 10(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 14731251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of irritant skin reactions using electrical impedance--a comparison between 2 laboratories.
    Kuzmina N, Duval C, Johnsson S, Boman A, Lindberg M, Emtestam L.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jul; 49(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 14641117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Differential epidermal expression of the invariant chain in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
    Emilson A, Lindberg M, Scheynius A.
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Nov; 78(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 9833035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electrical impedance for quantification and classification of experimental skin reactions.
    Emtestam L, Nyrén M.
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Dec; 8(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9358110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reflectance confocal microscopy may differentiate acute allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in vivo.
    Swindells K, Burnett N, Rius-Diaz F, González E, Mihm MC, González S.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Feb; 50(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 14726876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Combined effects of irritants and allergens. Synergistic effects of nickel and sodium lauryl sulfate in nickel- sensitized individuals.
    Agner T, Johansen JD, Overgaard L, Vølund A, Basketter D, Menné T.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jul; 47(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12225409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Thermography: High sensitivity and specificity diagnosing contact dermatitis in patch testing.
    Anzengruber F, Alotaibi F, Kaufmann LS, Ghosh A, Oswald MR, Maul JT, Meier B, French LE, Bonmarin M, Navarini AA.
    Allergol Int; 2019 Apr; 68(2):254-258. PubMed ID: 30598404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Irritant reactivity is a better risk marker for nickel sensitization than atopy.
    Elsner P, Burg G.
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1993 Jun; 73(3):214-6. PubMed ID: 8105624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant.
    Geier J, Uter W, Pirker C, Frosch PJ.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Feb; 48(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12694214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Crescendo reactions to sodium lauryl sulfate and retinoic acid in irritant patch tests.
    Löffler H, Effendy I.
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Jul; 37(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 9255498
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical manifestations of hand eczema compared by etiologic classification and irritation reactivity to SLS.
    Kang YC, Lee S, Ahn SK, Choi EH.
    J Dermatol; 2002 Aug; 29(8):477-83. PubMed ID: 12227480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Allergic contact dermatitis to detergents: a multicenter study to assess prevalence.
    Belsito DV, Fransway AF, Fowler JF, Sherertz EF, Maibach HI, Mark JG, Mathias CG, Rietschel RL, Storrs FJ, Nethercott JR.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2002 Feb; 46(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 11807430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Basal electrical impedance in relation to sodium lauryl sulphate-induced skin reactions--a comparison of patients with eczema and healthy controls.
    Kuzmina N, Hagströmer L, Nyrén M, Emtestam L.
    Skin Res Technol; 2003 Nov; 9(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 14641887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Beneficial effects of a skin tolerance-tested moisturizing cream on the barrier function in experimentally-elicited irritant and allergic contact dermatitis.
    De Paépe K, Hachem JP, Vanpee E, Goossens A, Germaux MA, Lachapelle JM, Lambert J, Matthieu L, Roseeuw D, Suys E, Van Hecke E, Rogiers V.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Jun; 44(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 11380543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
    Smith HR, Rowson M, Basketter DA, McFadden JP.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The association between ambient air conditions (temperature and absolute humidity), irritant sodium lauryl sulfate patch test reactions and patch test reactivity to standard allergens.
    Uter W, Hegewald J, Pfahlberg A, Pirker C, Frosch PJ, Gefeller O.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Aug; 49(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 14641358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.