These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

240 related items for PubMed ID: 12645608

  • 1. Equality theory and reproductive freedom.
    Colker R.
    Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):99-122. PubMed ID: 12645608
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Graines S, Wyatt J.
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Sex selection abortion and the boomerang effect of a woman's right to choose: a paradox of the skeptics.
    Kohm LM.
    William Mary J Women Law; 1997; 4(1):91-128. PubMed ID: 16389677
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
    Law SA.
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP.
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L.
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
    Schmutz SD.
    Houst Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Maltz EM.
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003 Jul; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J.
    Womens Health Issues; 1993 Jul; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB.
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993 Jul; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Abortion and a nation at war.
    First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Sullivan PA, Goldzwig SR.
    Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R.
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996 May; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE.
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Assisted suicide and reproductive freedom: exploring some connections.
    Appleton SF.
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1998 Mar; 76(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 11657576
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA.
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001 Mar; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
    Nivala J.
    Const Law J; 1993 Mar; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom.
    Ellis DA.
    Const Law J; 1996 Mar; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N.
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.