These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study. Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y, Tajimi Study Group. Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The reliability of frequency-doubling perimetry in young children. Blumenthal EZ, Haddad A, Horani A, Anteby I. Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 15019315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects]. Chiseliţa D, Ioana MC, Danielescu C, Mihaela NM. Oftalmologia; 2006 Mar; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing the use of frequency doubling technology perimetry in community vision screenings. Nehmad L, Madonna RJ. Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):559-65. PubMed ID: 18594349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects? Fong KC, Byles DB, Constable PH. Eye (Lond); 2003 Apr; 17(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12724694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of an effective visual field testing strategy for a normal pediatric population. Akar Y, Yilmaz A, Yucel I. Ophthalmologica; 2008 Apr; 222(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 18617757 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking. Murray IC, Fleck BW, Brash HM, Macrae ME, Tan LL, Minns RA. Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study. Haymes SA, Hutchison DM, McCormick TA, Varma DK, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of test reliability on the screening performance of frequency-doubling perimetry. Heeg GP, Jansonius NM. Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):585-7. PubMed ID: 16490521 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice. North RV, Jones AL, Hunter E, Morgan JE, Wild JM. Eye (Lond); 2006 Jun; 20(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 15999135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]