These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

281 related items for PubMed ID: 12675460

  • 21. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques.
    Turssi CP, Saad JR, Duarte SL, Rodrigues AL.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Jun; 13(3):136-8. PubMed ID: 11763949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites.
    Marghalani HY.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 20433565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Rousson V.
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB, Arisu HD, Omürlü H, Eligüzeloğlu E, Ozcan S, Ergun G.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb 01; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The use of confocal microscopy to assess surface roughness of two milled CAD-CAM ceramics following two polishing techniques.
    Al-Shammery HA, Bubb NL, Youngson CC, Fasbinder DJ, Wood DJ.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jun 01; 23(6):736-41. PubMed ID: 16914192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M, Sehr K, Klimek J.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Jun 01; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M, Voit S, Klimek J.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Jun 01; 28(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12540119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites.
    Koh R, Neiva G, Dennison J, Yaman P.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb 01; 9(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18264536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites.
    Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, dos Santos Dias CT.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun 01; 15(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12469758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures.
    Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Serra MC.
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jul 01; 21(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 15978273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium.
    Reddy ES, Patil NP, Guttal SS, Jagadish HG.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Jul 01; 16(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 17451480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A, Yuzbasioglu E, Sarac D.
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015 Jul 01; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Finishing tooth-colored restorations in vitro: an index of surface alteration and finish-line destruction.
    Schmidlin PR, Göhring TN.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Jul 01; 29(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 14753337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [A proposed clinical method for the finishing of composite-resin restorations by means of diamond burs and abrasive disks and strips: a SEM analysis].
    D'Arcangelo C, Delle Fratte T.
    Minerva Stomatol; 1996 Apr 01; 45(4):135-40. PubMed ID: 8926980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.
    Ahmad R, Morgano SM, Wu BM, Giordano RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov 01; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer.
    Tholt de Vasconcellos B, Miranda-Júnior WG, Prioli R, Thompson J, Oda M.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Nov 01; 31(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16924984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effect of artificial saliva storage on microhardness and fracture toughness of a hydrothermal glass-ceramic.
    Fahmy NZ, El Guindy J, Zamzam M.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun 01; 18(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 19486457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes and toothbrushing on the surface roughness of resin composite materials in vitro.
    Neme AM, Wagner WC, Pink FE, Frazier KB.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Jun 01; 28(6):808-15. PubMed ID: 14653298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Influence of external and internal surface roughness modifications on ceramic flexural strength.
    Ruschel VC, Maia HP, Lopes GC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct 01; 112(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 24819531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Influence of the finishing technique on surface roughness of dental porcelains with different microstructures.
    Sasahara RM, Ribeiro Fda C, Cesar PF, Yoshimura HN.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Oct 01; 31(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 17024946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.