These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


187 related items for PubMed ID: 1267923

  • 1. Binocular fixation pattern.
    Zipf RF.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1976 Mar; 94(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 1267923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. False amblyopia prediction in strabismic patients by fixation preference testing correlates with contralateral ocular dominance.
    AlHarkan DH, Khan AO.
    J AAPOS; 2014 Oct; 18(5):453-6. PubMed ID: 25266829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia.
    Hakim OM.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2007 Oct; 44(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 17542440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of central, steady, maintained fixation grading for predicting inter-eye visual acuity difference to diagnose and treat amblyopia in strabismic patients.
    Kothari M, Bhaskare A, Mete D, Toshniwal S, Doshi P, Kaul S.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 57(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 19574695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fixation instability during binocular viewing in anisometropic and strabismic children.
    Kelly KR, Cheng-Patel CS, Jost RM, Wang YZ, Birch EE.
    Exp Eye Res; 2019 Jun; 183():29-37. PubMed ID: 30006273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Binocular fixation pattern and visual acuity in children with strabismic amblyopia.
    Laws D, Noonan CP, Ward A, Chandna A.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2000 Jun; 37(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 10714692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fixation preference and visual acuity testing in a population-based cohort of preschool children with amblyopia risk factors.
    Cotter SA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Song E, Lin J, Borchert M, Azen SP, Varma R, Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 18962921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The accuracy of binocular fixation preference for the diagnosis of strabismic amblyopia.
    Procianoy L, Procianoy E.
    J AAPOS; 2010 Jun; 14(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 20418133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Changes in the binocular fixation patterns and the visually evoked potential in the treatment of esotropia with amblyopia.
    Wilcox LM, Sokol S.
    Ophthalmology; 1980 Dec; 87(12):1273-81. PubMed ID: 7243216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Depth of strabismic amblyopia determined with neutral density filters.
    Cadera W, Pachtman MA, Ellis FD, Helveston EM.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Jun; 95(6):763-6. PubMed ID: 6859184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reliability of fixation preference testing in diagnosing amblyopia.
    Wright KW, Edelman PM, Walonker F, Yiu S.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Apr; 104(4):549-53. PubMed ID: 3954659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of font size on reading performance in strabismic amblyopia: an eye movement investigation.
    Kanonidou E, Gottlob I, Proudlock FA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jan 23; 55(1):451-9. PubMed ID: 24370829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Amblyopic children read more slowly than controls under natural, binocular reading conditions.
    Kelly KR, Jost RM, De La Cruz A, Birch EE.
    J AAPOS; 2015 Dec 23; 19(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 26610788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.