These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

187 related items for PubMed ID: 12691370

  • 1. Laser projection versus a CRT display in the visual perception of aircraft aspect.
    Niall KK.
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(4):630-43. PubMed ID: 12691370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Eye height scaling of absolute size in immersive and nonimmersive displays.
    Dixon MW, Wraga M, Proffitt DR, Williams GC.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):582-93. PubMed ID: 10811164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Distance and organization in multifunction displays.
    Seidler KS, Wickens CD.
    Hum Factors; 1992 Oct; 34(5):555-69. PubMed ID: 1459566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Individual differences in distance estimation: comparison of judgments in the field with those from projected slides of the same scenes.
    Fine BJ, Kobrick JL.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Aug; 57(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 6622171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In-Flight Study of Helmet-Mounted Symbology System Concepts in Degraded Visual Environments.
    Cheung B, Craig G, Steels B, Sceviour R, Cosman V, Jennings S, Holst P.
    Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2015 Aug; 86(8):714-22. PubMed ID: 26387895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Spatial judgments with monoscopic and stereoscopic presentation of perspective displays.
    Yeh YY, Silverstein LD.
    Hum Factors; 1992 Oct; 34(5):583-600. PubMed ID: 1459568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Assessing the influence of operational factors on the perceived structure of real-world scenes viewed during low-altitude, high-speed flight.
    Kleiss JA.
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996 Oct; 6(4):335-58. PubMed ID: 11540401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The use of direction and distance information in the perception of approach trajectory.
    Rushton SK, Duke PA.
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):899-912. PubMed ID: 17321562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.
    Pelli DG.
    Spat Vis; 1997 Mar; 10(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 9176953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Explicit and implicit horizons for simulated landing approaches.
    Lintern G, Liu YT.
    Hum Factors; 1991 Aug; 33(4):401-17. PubMed ID: 1955202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Illusory figures based on local kinematics.
    Bruno N, Gerbino W.
    Perception; 1991 Aug; 20(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 1745596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.