These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
142 related items for PubMed ID: 12695220
1. Qualitative assessment of cervical spinal stenosis: observer variability on CT and MR images. Stafira JS, Sonnad JR, Yuh WT, Huard DR, Acker RE, Nguyen DL, Maley JE, Ramji FG, Li WB, Loftus CM. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Apr; 24(4):766-9. PubMed ID: 12695220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Observer agreement of spine stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging analysis of patients with cervical spine myelopathy. Cook C, Braga-Baiak A, Pietrobon R, Shah A, Neto AC, de Barros N. J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 May; 31(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 18486747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Improved magnetic resonance myelography using image fusion]. Eberhardt K, Ganslandt O, Stadlbauer A. Rofo; 2013 Apr; 185(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 23348124 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis? Sasaki K, Hasegawa K, Shimoda H, Keiji I, Homma T. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():S77-83. PubMed ID: 23542928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraobserver, interobserver, and intermethod agreement for results of myelography, computed tomography-myelography, and low-field magnetic resonance imaging in dogs with disk-associated wobbler syndrome. De Decker S, Gielen IM, Duchateau L, Corzo-Menéndez N, van Bree HJ, Kromhout K, Bosmans T, Van Ham LM. J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2011 Jun 15; 238(12):1601-8. PubMed ID: 21671815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of noncontrast computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of Great Danes with cervical spondylomyelopathy. Martin-Vaquero P, da Costa RC, Drost WT. Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2014 Jun 15; 55(5):496-505. PubMed ID: 24547789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative evaluation of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy by surface-coil MR imaging. Brown BM, Schwartz RH, Frank E, Blank NK. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Dec 15; 151(6):1205-12. PubMed ID: 2847516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging methods in the assessment of spinal canal stenosis and cord compression in cervical myelopathy. Karpova A, Arun R, Davis AM, Kulkarni AV, Mikulis DJ, Sooyong C, Rabin D, Craciunas S, Smith SR, Hansen MA, George J, Fehlings MG. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb 01; 38(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 22772577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of maximum canal compromise and spinal cord compression for evaluation of acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Fehlings MG, Furlan JC, Massicotte EM, Arnold P, Aarabi B, Harrop J, Anderson DG, Bono CM, Dvorak M, Fisher C, France J, Hedlund R, Madrazo I, Nockels R, Rampersaud R, Rechtine G, Vaccaro AR, Spine Trauma Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul 01; 31(15):1719-25. PubMed ID: 16816769 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Observer variability in the evaluation of multiple lumbar stenosis by routine MR--myelography and MRI. Song KS, Jang EC, Jung HJ, Kim KW, Yu H. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Dec 01; 21(8):569-74. PubMed ID: 19057250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic value of oblique magnetic resonance images for evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis. Park MS, Moon SH, Lee HM, Kim TH, Oh JK, Lee SY, Oh JB, Riew KD. Spine J; 2015 Apr 01; 15(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 25452016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical usefulness of CT-myelogram comparing with the MRI in degenerative cervical spinal disorders: is CTM still useful for primary diagnostic tool? Song KJ, Choi BW, Kim GH, Kim JR. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul 01; 22(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 19525791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability. Furlan JC, Fehlings MG, Massicotte EM, Aarabi B, Vaccaro AR, Bono CM, Madrazo I, Villanueva C, Grauer JN, Mikulis D. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep 01; 32(19):2083-91. PubMed ID: 17762809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of myelography, CT myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylosis and disk herniation. Pre- and postoperative findings. Larsson EM, Holtås S, Cronqvist S, Brandt L. Acta Radiol; 1989 Sep 01; 30(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 2736175 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and myelography in 18 Doberman pinscher dogs with cervical spondylomyelopathy. da Costa RC, Parent J, Dobson H, Holmberg D, Partlow G. Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2006 Sep 01; 47(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 17153059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A radiologist with a ruler.. Miller GM. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Apr 01; 24(4):556. PubMed ID: 12695181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of computed tomography myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. Shafaie FF, Wippold FJ, Gado M, Pilgram TK, Riew KD. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep 01; 24(17):1781-5. PubMed ID: 10488507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The normal appearance of CT myelograms. Rocos B, Evans DRS, Rajayogeswaran B, Hutchinson MJ. Eur Spine J; 2020 May 01; 29(5):1087-1091. PubMed ID: 31901999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography. Kent DL, Haynor DR, Larson EB, Deyo RA. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 May 01; 158(5):1135-44. PubMed ID: 1533084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. 0.6 T MR imaging of the cervical spine: multislice and multiecho techniques. Hyman RA, Edwards JH, Vacirca SJ, Stein HL. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1985 May 01; 6(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 3920881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]